2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00531-004-0414-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zircon ages, geochemistry, and Nd isotopic systematics of pre-Variscan orthogneisses from the Erzgebirge, Saxony (Germany), and geodynamic interpretation

Abstract: High grade granitoid orthogneisses occur in several metamorphic units of the Erzgebirge in the Saxothuringian Zone of the Variscan Belt. The determination of protolith ages and the geochemical characterization of these rocks permit a reconstruction of the Neoproterozoic to early Palaeozoic magmatic and geodynamic history of the Erzgebirge. Single zircon Pb-Pb evaporation and SHRIMP ages combined with major and trace element data and Sm-Nd isotope systematics indicate at least two discrete magmatic events conce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
1
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
2
29
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This dataset may be interpreted as the result of variable mixing of crustal components as it has already been described in other areas of the European Variscan Belt, such as the Bohemian Massif, where felsic igneous rocks provide εNd values between − 3.3 and − 7.9 (− 3.3 to − 5.0 by Linnemann and Romer 2002, and − 4.9 to − 7.9 by Mingram et al 2004). These authors interpreted the corresponding Mesoproterozoic (between 1.6 and 1.9 Ga) TDM ages as the result of the mixing of Palaeoproterozoic-Archean and Neoproterozoic crustal portions.…”
Section: Sm-nd Isotopic Datasupporting
confidence: 56%
“…This dataset may be interpreted as the result of variable mixing of crustal components as it has already been described in other areas of the European Variscan Belt, such as the Bohemian Massif, where felsic igneous rocks provide εNd values between − 3.3 and − 7.9 (− 3.3 to − 5.0 by Linnemann and Romer 2002, and − 4.9 to − 7.9 by Mingram et al 2004). These authors interpreted the corresponding Mesoproterozoic (between 1.6 and 1.9 Ga) TDM ages as the result of the mixing of Palaeoproterozoic-Archean and Neoproterozoic crustal portions.…”
Section: Sm-nd Isotopic Datasupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Similar ages were reported from NW Iberia (Fernández-Suárez et al 2002), the NE Bohemian Massif (Hegner and Kröner 2000;Mingram et al 2004), the Moravo-Silesian Unit (Friedl et al 2000(Friedl et al , 2004, West Avalonia Murphy 1994, 1996), East Avalonia (Strachan et al 2007), the Małopolska Unit (Belka et al 2002) and the Polish East European Platform (Belka et al 2002). Such ages, however, are not known from the Meguma Terrane , Saxothuringia (e.g.…”
Section: Pirgadikia Terranesupporting
confidence: 50%
“…An Ordovician age was published for the Schwarzenberg augengneiss (Mingram et al 2004), while the Wolkenstein and Bärenstein augengneisses yielded Neoproterozoic ages (Table 1; Kröner et al 1997;Mingram et al 2004). Rötzler and Plessen (2010) interpreted the latter age as dating a metamorphic or magmatic event at 580-570 Ma.…”
Section: Previous Geochronologymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Zircon characteristics (morphology and ages) may help to unravel the protoliths of these rocks. Previous studies yielded zircon ages ranging from 3,200 to 340 Ma with inferred protolith ages between 575 and 480 Ma (Kröner et al 1995(Kröner et al , 1997Tichomirowa et al 2001;Kröner and Willner 1998;Mingram and Rötzler 1999;Kosler et al 2004;Mingram et al 2004). The Variscan overprint caused a severe disturbance of zircon ages in some ultra-highpressure (UHP) gneisses of the Erzgebirge (Tichomirowa et al 2005), and thus, there is still an ongoing discussion which of the gneisses should be assigned to the same protoliths.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%