Zirconia-Based Anterior Resin-Bonded Single-Retainer Cantilever Fixed Dental Prostheses: A 15- to 61-Month Follow-Up

Klink, Andrea; Hüttig, Fabian

doi:10.11607/ijp.4220

Cited by 30 publications

(35 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…As a result, CCTs that compare cantilever design and classical two retainer design showed that cantilever design is more successful than two retainer design RBFDPs in the anterior region . Most of the PCSs and RCSs also showed high success rates for cantilever design RBFDP in the anterior region that supports the results of CCTs …”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 65%

“…Also, with zirconia framework in addition to airborne‐particle abrasion, dual‐cure resin cement with metal zirconia primer can be used for the cementation of RBFDPs . The second cementation technique for zirconia framework is veneering of the interproximal spaces with felspathic ceramics and the buccal surfaces of the retainer's wings with a thin ceramic coating to allow an adhesive cementation.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Klink et al evaluated zirconia‐based cantilever design anterior RBFDPs (Table ). They used many zirconia materials from different brands with their own CAD/CAM systems.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Most of the current clinical studies showed that cantilever design RBFDPs are superior than two retainer design in the anterior region . However, there are limited number of RCTs and CCTs in the literature, so the level of evidence of this result is mainly from cohort studies as mentioned before in the previous review articles …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In addition, with zirconia framework in addition to airborneparticle abrasion, dual-cure resin cement with metal zirconia primer can be used for the cementation of RBFDPs. 46 The second cementation RBFDPs. 32 He published these patients after 5 years, 10 years, and 15 years follow-ups [32][33][34] (Table T3 3 Ries et al 28 compared the clinical success of cantilever design with two lingual retainer design RBFDPs made of lithium disilicate (Table 3).…”

Section: Aq2mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Clinical procedures, designs, and survival rates of all‐ceramic resin‐bonded fixed dental prostheses in the anterior region: A systematic review

Tezulaş

Yıldız

Evren

et al. 2018

J Esthet Restor Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Indications, designs, abutment teeth preparation, provisionalization, try-in, surface treatment options, and cementation of the all-ceramic resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses are described in this article. Clinical survival rates are also given in detail, so that clinicians can easily compare the current studies and give their own decision about all-ceramic resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses in the anterior region.

show abstract

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 65%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Klink et al evaluated zirconia‐based cantilever design anterior RBFDPs (Table ). They used many zirconia materials from different brands with their own CAD/CAM systems.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Aq2mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Clinical procedures, designs, and survival rates of all‐ceramic resin‐bonded fixed dental prostheses in the anterior region: A systematic review

Tezulaş

Yıldız

Evren

et al. 2018

J Esthet Restor Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

A 3‐year controlled clinical trial comparing high‐translucency zirconia (cubic zirconia) with lithium disilicate glass ceramic (e.max)

Fawakhiri,

Abboud,

Kanout

2023

Clinical & Exp Dental Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionThe rate of clinical success in veneers, under esthetics, has achieved a range of 18 months to 20 years. In a plethora of studies, it registers a success rate reaching 75% and even 100%. The most common type of glass ceramics used in ceramics is the vitreous lithium disilicate crystal‐reinforced material, e.max®. Recent studies focus on “polycrystalline ceramic use” in manufacturing veneers, as it possesses a stronger structure and different enabling manufacturing schemes.ObjectivesThis research aims at comparing e.max and the high‐translucent Cubic Zirconia. Such comparison is administered to veneers manufacturing: esthetic (surface and edge, and staining and color matching), functional (crack and fracture, contact point, and patient satisfaction), and biological (posttreatment vitality and hypersensitivity, and periodontal response).Materials and MethodsThe research sample consisted of 60 veneers, divided into two groups: cubic zirconia and e.max. The sample included 2 males (16.6%) and 10 females (83.3%), with age ranging from 25 to 37 years. Patients were thoroughly diagnosed and treated and included in this study based on certain inclusion–exclusion criteria. Hickel's 2010 criteria were utilized to examine and observe the clinical aspect of veneers during intervals of 1 week, 3 months, 1 year, and 3 years.ResultsNo significant differences were traced across the groups for all the variables, with a p‐value being greater than 0.05. The e.max group revealed better clinical results compared to the cubic zirconia one regarding esthetics and tooth translucency. Nonetheless, the results showed a merely slight increase in hypersensitivity in the e.max group.ConclusionWithin the limitation of an extensive follow‐up period, we can conclude that there is no difference between cubic zirconia and e.max (p > 0.05), where e.max and cubic zirconia veneers have the same characteristics in terms of the following. The characteristics of the aspects examined were esthetic, functional, and biological.

show abstract

Success of 3-Unit Posterior All-Ceramic Inlay-Retained Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Narrative Literature Review

Al-Fodeh

Al-Dwairi

Husain

et al. 2023

Curr Oral Health Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Zirconia-Based Anterior Resin-Bonded Single-Retainer Cantilever Fixed Dental Prostheses: A 15- to 61-Month Follow-Up

Cited by 30 publications

References 0 publications

Clinical procedures, designs, and survival rates of all‐ceramic resin‐bonded fixed dental prostheses in the anterior region: A systematic review

Clinical procedures, designs, and survival rates of all‐ceramic resin‐bonded fixed dental prostheses in the anterior region: A systematic review

A 3‐year controlled clinical trial comparing high‐translucency zirconia (cubic zirconia) with lithium disilicate glass ceramic (e.max)

Success of 3-Unit Posterior All-Ceramic Inlay-Retained Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Narrative Literature Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About