TiO2 and SiO2 are very useful materials for
building biointerfaces. A particularly interesting aspect is their
interaction with lipid bilayers. Many past research efforts focused
on phosphocholine (PC) lipids, which form supported lipid bilayers
(SLB) on SiO2 at physiological conditions but are adsorbed
as intact liposomes on TiO2. Low pH was required to form
PC SLBs on TiO2. This work intends to understand the surface
forces and chemistry responsible for such differences. Two charge
neutral lipids: 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine
(DOPC) and 2-((2,3-bis(oleoyloxy)propyl)dimethylammonio)ethyl ethyl
phosphate (DOCPe) and two negatively charged lipids: 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-l-serine (DOPS) and 2-((2,3-bis(oleoyloxy)propyl)dimethylammonio)ethyl
hydrogen phosphate (DOCP) were used. Using calcein leakage assays,
adsorption measurement, cryo-TEM, and washing, we concluded that charge
is the dominating factor on SiO2. The two neutral lipids
form SLB on SiO2 at pH 3 and 7, but the two negatively
charged ones cannot form. On TiO2, both charge and coordination
chemistry are important. The two anionic lipids formed SLB from pH
3 to 10. DOCP had stronger affinity than DOPS likely due to the tighter
terminal phosphate binding of the former. The two neutral liposomes
formed SLB only at pH 3, where phosphate interaction and van der Waals
force are deemed important. The pH 3 prepared TiO2 DOPC
SLBs are destabilized at neutral pH, indicating the reversible nature
of the interaction. This work has provided new insights into two important
materials interacting with common liposomes, which are important for
reproducible biosensing, device fabrication, and drug delivery applications.