2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.05.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ZnMgSSe/ZnSe/CdSe quantum dot heterostructures for green laser applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, in the past decades, it has been witnessed that the advance of heterostructure technology results in the much improved device performance and new device functionalities. [ 6–8 ]…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in the past decades, it has been witnessed that the advance of heterostructure technology results in the much improved device performance and new device functionalities. [ 6–8 ]…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the reflection coefficients of the cavity mirrors in the heterostructures are different because of the different design and significantly differing emission wavelengths. Therefore, we calculated the distribution of the fundamental mode of electromagnetic radiation in the heterostructures A and B for wavelengths of 570 and 590 nm, respectively, in the plane wave approximation . Thus we determined the reflection coefficients of the cavity mirrors at the fundamental mode, the radiation far field patterns and the optical confinement factors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the figure shows, the experimental data are well approximated by a linear dependence. Using the relation, in which I thr is expressed in an exponential form Ithr=InormalTηnormaliexptrue(αi+1Llntrue(1Rtrue)ΓG0true), one can estimate the magnitudes of transparency intensity I T and characteristic gain ΓG 0 for the structures using the experimental values of the threshold excitation intensity for a set of lasers with different L cav . Estimated ΓG 0 exhibited values of 54 and 81 cm −1 , I T was 0.6 and 1.2 kW cm −2 for structures A and B , correspondingly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%