2023
DOI: 10.1007/s00339-023-06514-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ZnO micro/nanorods: their performance in the photocatalytic degradation and photodiode

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At this point, we can focus on another reason for the diode we chose among the specimens. Since the selected diode has much less leakage current in the dark, both S and D * values are quite satisfactory. Still, it is seen that it depends on the illumination intensities proportionally with R values (see Figure b) . Furthermore, the D * value of the diode was found to be 5.53 × 10 9 Jones under 120 mW cm –2 at zero bias voltage (self-powered mode), which is the situation where no voltage is applied to the structure and the charge carriers create photocurrent only with the diffusion effect.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…At this point, we can focus on another reason for the diode we chose among the specimens. Since the selected diode has much less leakage current in the dark, both S and D * values are quite satisfactory. Still, it is seen that it depends on the illumination intensities proportionally with R values (see Figure b) . Furthermore, the D * value of the diode was found to be 5.53 × 10 9 Jones under 120 mW cm –2 at zero bias voltage (self-powered mode), which is the situation where no voltage is applied to the structure and the charge carriers create photocurrent only with the diffusion effect.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Two important parameters required for analyzing the performance of photodiodes are responsivity ( R ) and detectivity ( D *). R and D * are given by the following equations, respectively 64,65 : R0.28embadbreak=IphIdarkP.A$$\begin{equation}R\; = \frac{{{I_{{\mathrm{ph}}}} - {I_{{\mathrm{dark}}}}}}{{P.A}}\end{equation}$$where I ph , P , and A are photocurrent, is the incident optical power, and effective area of the photodiode, respectively. 0.28emDbadbreak=R2qJdark$$\begin{equation}{\mathrm{\;}}{D^*} = \frac{R}{{\sqrt {2q{J_{{\mathrm{dark}}}}} }}\end{equation}$$where q and J dark are the elementary charges and the current density in the dark, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two important parameters required for analyzing the performance of photodiodes are responsivity (R) and detectivity (D*). R and D* are given by the following equations, respectively 64,65 :…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zinc oxide (ZnO) is also considered an important semiconductor material with promising potential, sharing similar characteristics to TiO 2 . In this regard, ZnO nanostructures are gaining attention in various fields, including solar cells, 3 gas sensors 4 , and photocatalysts 5 due to their high specific surface area and surface activity 6 . However, the high energy of the nanoparticle surface often causes aggregation, 7 which leads to a reduction of the specific surface area as well as the active sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%