Zom Koyunlarının Morfolojik Özellikleri

Koncagül, Seyrani; Akça, Nalan; Vural, Mehmet Emin; Karataş, Ahmet; Bingöl, Mehmet

doi:10.9775/kvfd.2012.6522

Cited by 9 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Statistically significant correlation coefficients were also observed between body weights and SH, LF, LH, and HL. Correlation coefficients found in this study were in accordance with those reported for other species such as sheep (Turgay et al, 1999;Koncagül et al, 2012), goat (Cam et al, 2010), and cattle (Koç and Akman, 2007).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Some morphological characteristics and neonatal weights of reintroduced gazelle (Gazella subgutturosa) in Turkey

Gürler

Bozkaya²,

Özüt³

et al. 2015

Turk J Zool

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Today their number was assumed to be approximately 120,000-140,000 by Mallon and Kingswood (2001), but populations throughout the range have decreased since then and are subject to continuing illegal hunting and habitat loss (IUCN, 2013). Until the 20th century, the distribution of Gazella in Turkey included a large area extending from Çukurova-Adana to Eastern Anatolia. However, they were restricted to several isolated locations in Şanlıurfa, Hatay, and Adana during the last century due to overhunting, live-trapping of juveniles for trade, heavy pesticide use, and habitat degradation (Turan, 1977;Demirsoy, 2003). Due to their rapidly decreasing number, gazelles were classified by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) as lower risk, near threatened, and vulnerable in , 2003in , and 2006in , respectively (IUCN, 2013. Therefore, gazelles are considered to be under a high risk of extinction (Baillie and Groombridge, 1996;IUCN, 2013).The first attempt to protect the existence of gazelles in Turkey was a hunting prohibition put into law in 1957 (Turan, 1984). In spite of the prohibition, the decline in the number of gazelles continued and the Turkish General Directorate of Nature Protection and National Parks started another conservation program in 1968 in order to reintroduce gazelles to the wild. In 1977, a 26-ha fenced captive breeding station was established in Ceylanpınar-Şanlıurfa with 3 females from Şanlıurfa and 1 male and female from the Tarsus district of Mersin Province. The gazelles reared in this station were later used to establish 3 further captive breeding stations in Şanlıurfa, Gaziantep,

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Some morphological characteristics and neonatal weights of reintroduced gazelle (Gazella subgutturosa) in Turkey

Gürler

Bozkaya²,

Özüt³

et al. 2015

Turk J Zool

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This sheep was first identified and described, and its morphological characteristics were reported 3 based on the results of a project supported by General Directorate of Agricultural Researches and Politics (GDARP). They reported that average live weights, wither heights and body lengths of mature males and females of this sheep were 71.7±2.67 kg and 48.8±0.57 kg, 77.1±2.01 cm and 68.3±0.43 cm, 65.4±1.16 cm and 60.3±0.25 cm, respectively.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reproductive Performance of Ewes and Growth Characteristics of Lambs in Zom Sheep Reared in Karacadağ District

Koncagül¹,

Vural²,

Karataş³

et al. 2013

Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This is the first study and report in which some ewe reproductive and lamb growth performances of Zom sheep were investigated and described in Turkey. The research was carried out on three different flocks randomly chosen among the Zom sheep flocks in the district of Karacadağ surrounded by Diyarbakır, Şanlıurfa and Mardin provinces, and lasted for two years, 2010 and 2011. The data consisted of 242 and 254 heads of lamb born from 226 and 214 heads of ewe in 2010 and 2011, respectively. Lambing rate (LR), twinning rate (TW), fecundity (FEC) and litter size (LITS) were found as 94%, 17%, 1.09 and 1.17 on average, respectively. There was no significant difference among flocks within years or among years within flocks in terms of ewe reproductive performance, except for the flock 2 in terms of TW. Average means of the birth weight (BWT), weaning weight (WWT) at 90 th day and 6 th month live weight (SMLW) were 4.00 kg and 22.06 kg, 36.11 kg, respectively. The effects of age of dam, type of birth and sex of lambs were significant on BWT, WWT and SMLW (P<0.05). Besides the WWT was also significantly affected by the year (P<0.05), every 1 kg increase in BWT caused 2.02±0.281 kg increase on average in WWT of lambs (P<0.01). In addition, it was observed that the havier lambs at birth were havier in terms of SMLW (P<0.01). The average daily weight gain (ADWG1) and survival rate (SR) of lambs at weaning were 200 g/day and 90%, respectively. Keywords: Zom sheep, Reproductive performance, Lamb growth, Lamb survival Karacadağ Yöresinde Yetiştirilen Zom Koyunlarının Üreme Performansı ve Kuzularının Büyüme Özellikleri ÖzetBu araştırma, Zom koyunlarında bazı döl verimi ve kuzularda büyüme özelliklerini araştıran ve tanımlayan Türkiye'deki ilk çalışmadır. Araştırma, 2010 ve 2011 yıllarında, Diyarbakır, Şanlıurfa ve Mardin şehirlerinin çevrelediği Karacadağ bölgesinde Zom koyunu yetiştiriciliği yapan işletmeler arasından rastgele belirlenen 3 sürüde yürütülmüştür. Veriler, 2010 ve 2011 yıllarında doğum yapan sırasıyla 226 ve 214 baş koyun ve bunlardan doğan 242 ve 254 baş kuzularadan elde edilmiştir. Kuzulama oranı (KO), ikizlik oranı (İO), koçaltı koyun başına doğan kuzu sayısı (KKKS) ve doğuran koyun başına kuzu sayısı (DKKS) ortalamaları sırasıyla %94, %17, 1.09 ve 1.17 olarak tespit edilmiştir. İkinci sürüdeki İO hariç, koyun üreme performansı bakımından değişik yıllarda sürü içinde ya da aynı yılda sürüler arasında farklılık gözlemlenmemiştir. Ortalama doğum ağırlığı (DA), sütten kesim ağırlığı (SKA) ve altıncı ay canlı ağırlık (AACA) ortalaması sırasıyla 4.00, 22.06 ve 36.11 kg olarak tespit edilmiştir. DA, SKA ve AACA, ana yaşı, doğum tipi ve cinsiyet faktörlerinden önemli derecede etkilenmişlerdir (P<0.05). SKA üzerine yıl faktörünün de önemli etkisi tespit edilmiş (P<0.05), bunun yanında, DA'da meydana gelen her 1 kg'lık artışa karşılık SKA'da ortalama olarak 2.02±0.281 kg'lık bir artışın meydana geldiği gözlenmiştir (P<0.01). Buna ek olarak, doğumda daha ağır olan kuzuların AACA bakımından da daha ağır oldukları tespit e...

show abstract

“…This length was determined to be shorter than Kıvırcık rams (36.4 cm) and ewes (35.3 cm) in a study previously reported. It is also shorter than Sakız (Chios), Gökçeada (Imroz), Karayaka, Zom, Karagül, Tuj, Çine Çaparı breeds (Özcan, 1970a;Anonymous, 2009, Erol andAkçadağ, 2009;Koncagül et al, 2012).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 93%

“…A study reported that the wither height of Kıvırcık is 64 cm and 69 cm for ewes and rams, respectively Özcan (1970a and 1970b) and Anonymous (2019) found these values as 66 cm and 65 cm for the Kıvırcık sheep. The withers height of Yalova genotype is higher than Akkaraman, Morkaraman, Dağlıç, İvesi (Awassi), Çine Çaparı, Güney Karaman, Karagül, Tuj, Herik, Karayaka, Gökçeada (Imroz), Pırlak, Zom breeds, similar to Karya, Sakız (Chios), Hemşin, Norduz, Karacabey Merino and lower than Kangal Akkaraman (Yılmaz ve ark., 2011;Koncagül et al, 2012;Yılmaz et al, 2013;Özbeyaz et al, 2018;Anonymous, 2019). x Back height, rump width, body length, rump width, chest width, chest depth and chest girth of Yalova genotype was higher than the reported values for Kivircik sheep.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Yalova Genotipinin Morfolojik Özellikleri Üzerine Bazı Çevre Faktörlerinin Etkileri

Alarslan¹,

Aygün

2020

Hayvansal Üretim

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: This study aimed to determine the live weight, the body measurements and their morphological features, and the effect of some environmental factors on morphological characteristics of Yalova sheep. Materials and Methods: The research material was consisted of 1-5≤ year old 250 ewes from 5 flocks and 1-4 year old 70 rams from 13 flocks. Live weight, withers height, back height, rump height, body length, tail length, rump width, chest width, chest depth, chest girth, thigh circumstances, cannon bone girth, head length, head width, forehead width, ear length and ear width of Yalova genotype was measured. Results: The average live weight of Yalova genotype was found as 55.63 and 85.75 kg for ewes and rams, respectively. Overall means of some characters of ewes were found as withers height,

show abstract

Zom Koyunlarının Morfolojik Özellikleri

Cited by 9 publications

References 0 publications

Some morphological characteristics and neonatal weights of reintroduced gazelle (Gazella subgutturosa) in Turkey

Some morphological characteristics and neonatal weights of reintroduced gazelle (Gazella subgutturosa) in Turkey

Reproductive Performance of Ewes and Growth Characteristics of Lambs in Zom Sheep Reared in Karacadağ District

Yalova Genotipinin Morfolojik Özellikleri Üzerine Bazı Çevre Faktörlerinin Etkileri

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About