About five years ago several articles appeared containing experimental data which the authors of the articles felt were at variance with the Bronsted theory of salt effects. Thus Conant and Peterson (2) stated that they were unable to correlate their data on some coupling reactions with the theory. La Mer and Kamner (10) found that although increasing the ionic strength had the theoretical effect on the reaction between a-bromopropionate ion and thiosulfate ion, it had the opposite effect on the corresponding reaction between P-bromopropionate ion and thiosulfate ion. To explain this anomalous salt effect, La Mer and Kamner advanced their theory of oriented collisions, according to which a thiosulfate ion repels the carboxyl group of the acid ion and thus produces a favorable orientation for replacement of the bromine by the thiosulfate ion. The amount of this favorable orientation is decreased by the presence of other ions, thus overshadowing the primary salt effect. Sturtevant (14) showed from theoretical grounds that such a theory could not account for the phenomenon.Thus the beta-substituted compound reacted faster than the alpha-substituted compound, n-hich is contrary to a widely accepted rule of organic chemistry. La Mer (9) also reported that the heat of activation of this reaction had a temperature coefficient of over 100 calories per degree.Bedford (1) and his colleagues, studying the reaction between thiosulfate ion and bromosuccinate ion, in which the bromine is alpha to one carboxyl group and beta to the second, not only confirmed the peculiar salt effect of La Mer and Kamner, but found a temperature coefficient of the heat of activation fully three times as large as that reported by La Mer. These results were the more surprising since Olson and Long (13) have shown that reactions between bromo-and chloro-succinic acids and chloride andThe P-bromopropionate reaction showed several other anomalies.