Green plants and algae oxidize water to molecular oxygen in photosystem II (PS II) within a calcium/tetramanganese site known as the water-oxidizing complex (WOC). Oxygen is generated by the WOC in a four-electron process involving a series of intermediate states (S states, labeled S 0 …S 4 ) of increasingly higher mean oxidation level. [1] Over the past decade, X-ray crystallographic (XRD) structures of PS II at progressively improved resolution [2] have revealed much detail of the WOC. At present, only PS II from thermophilic cyanobacteria has been crystallized for XRD study and the enzyme is presumed to be in the dark stable S 1 state. The first PS II structure (at 3.5 resolution) to resolve side chain positions was presented by Barber and co-workers. [2c] Consistent with subsequent studies at higher resolution, it revealed the compact Mn 3 Ca "cube" structure of the WOC connected more distantly to a single Mn, referred to as the "dangler". More recent improved structures at 3.0 and 2.9 , [2d,e] substantially clarified the metal-and proteinsupplied ligand positions within the WOC, but were still of insufficient resolution to reveal the positions of bridging oxo groups and water molecules (including the substrate water molecules). Finally, Umena et al., [2f] using a new crystallization method, produced an atomic resolution structure at 1.9 , the most resolved to date. Despite this remarkable achievement, revealing, for the first time, the positions of bridging O atoms within the Mn 4 Ca core of the WOC, aspects of the new structure have been met with scepticism. [3,4] Central concerns over this structure involve 1) the identity and unexpected placement of the O(5) moiety (Figure 1), which appears to be either a weakly bound oxo, hydroxo, or water ligand at distances of 2.4-2.7 from four of the metal atoms in the WOC, and 2) the disparity in some key metalmetal distances when compared with earlier, high-precision extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) results [5,6] and the previous lower-resolution XRD structures (see Table 1). Although the Mn EXAFS data do not unambiguously assign the individual near (less than 3 ) metal-metal distances within the cluster, they clearly indicate that two Mn-Mn vectors of a magnitude of approximately 2.7 exist within the functional WOC in the S 1 and S 2 states. These are totally consistent with the Mn1-Mn2 and Mn2-Mn3 distances of 2.65 and 2.70 in the 2.9 resolution XRD structure, but are significantly shorter than the corresponding Mn-Mn distances of 2.80 and 2.90 seen in the 1.9 resolution XRD structure.The discrepancies between the XRD and EXAFS data have led some to suggest [3,4,7] that the crystal structures generally, and the 1.9 resolution structure in particular, have undergone photoreduction of the Mn atoms during data collection, increasing the Mn II content and distorting the cluster from the functional S 1 state to as low as S À3 . This is despite the fact that in the later studies great pains were taken to minimize such X-ray exposure. The claims of ph...