Zygomatic and Maxillary Implants Inserted by Means of Computer-Assisted Surgery in a Patient With a Cleft Palate

Santis, Daniele De; Trevisiol, Lorenzo; Cucchi, Alessandro; Canton, Luciano Claudio; Nocini, Pier Francesco

doi:10.1097/scs.0b013e3181d7a7d3

Cited by 22 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Zygomatic implant surgery is a valid and successful option to grafting procedures in the rehabilitation of edentulous atrophic maxilla due to degeneration, malformation and oncological causes (Goker et al, 2020b). There are a certain number of reports in literature about partial and total edentulous cases of CLP with or without oro-naso-sinus communications, that had oral rehabilitation with zygomatic implant insertions (de Santis et al, 2010;Landes et al, 2013;Leven et al, 2021).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Oral Rehabilitation of Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patient with Simultaneous LeFort I Osteotomy and Zygomatic Implants: A Case Report

Göker

Grecchi

Fabbro

et al. 2021

The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study is to evaluate Le Fort I Osteotomy and zygomatic implantation without any graft placement for management of a cleft lip and palate patient. This case report describes oral rehabilitation of a 33-year-old patient with bilateral cleft lip-palate and oronasal fistula and atrophic pre-maxilla. As treatment, the patient received simultaneous Le Fort I osteotomy, palatoplasty and two zygomatic implant insertions. The prosthetic superstructure included zygomatic implant-supported removable hybrid prosthesis on bar locator and metal-ceramic fixed bridges in the posterior region. As conclusion, this protocol can be promising for management of patients with cleft lip-palate and malocclusion.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Oral Rehabilitation of Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patient with Simultaneous LeFort I Osteotomy and Zygomatic Implants: A Case Report

Göker

Grecchi

Fabbro

et al. 2021

The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…De Santis ve ark. 22 onarılmamış yarık damaklı bir hastada premolar ve molar bölgeye yerleştirilen geleneksel dört dental implantla birlikte iki tane de zigomatik implant kullanarak hibrit bir protezle hastanın dental rehabilitasyonu sağlamışlardır. Bizim vakamızda hastanın kendi dişleri mevcut olduğu ve gerekli olan retansiyon ve stabiliteyi sağladığı için dental ya da zigomatik implant uygulamaları düşünülmemiştir.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Dudak Damak Yarikli Hastada Esteti̇k Ve Fonksi̇yonel Proteti̇k Rehabi̇li̇tasyon

Akay¹,

Karakış²,

Yaluğ³

2015

Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dudak damak yarığı (DDY) hamilelik sırasında yüzün anormal gelişimi sonucu dudak ve damak bölgesinde yarık oluşmasıyla karakterize konjenital bir anomalidir. DDY kesin etiyolojisi bilinmemektedir. Hastalarda genellikle oronazal açıklık, yarık bölgesine komşu olan dişlerin konjenital eksikliği ya da malformasyonu ve üst çenenin sagital ve transversal yönde yetersiz gelişimi ile karakterizedir. DDY uzun süreli ve kompleks tedavi gerektiren bir sağlık sorununa yol açar. Hastaların tedavisi, fonksiyo-nel ve estetik gelişimi maksillofasiyal cerrah, ortodon-tist, prostodontist, KBB uzmanı ve konuşma terapis-tinden oluşan multidisipliner bir ekip tarafından sağla-nabilir. DDY vakaları geleneksel veya (dental-zigoma-tik) implant destekli protezler ile rehabilite edilebilmektedir. Dişhekimi bu hastaların tedavisinde çeşitli zorluklarla karşılaşabilmektedir. Bu hastalarda premaksiller bölgenin protetik tedavisi oldukça önemlidir.Bu vaka sunumunda, 21 yaşında DDY nedeniyle kliniğimize başvuran hastaya konuşma, çiğneme ve estetik problemlerini gidermek için sabit hareketli protez uygulanarak, protetik rehabilitasyonu-nun avantaj ve dezavantajları tartışıldı.Yapılan protetik rehabilitasyon sonucun-da hastanın olmayan estetik fonksiyon ve fonasyonu sağlandı, bu eksikliklere bağlı olarak oluşan psikososyal sorunlar giderildi. 1 yıllık klinik takipte hastanın yapılan işlemden memnun olduğu herhangi bir sorun yaşamadığı belirlendi.

show abstract

“…2) History of periodontitis (27); 3) Traumatic injuries , cleft lip and palate and congenital defects (20,(27)(28)(29); 4) Failure of previous maxillary rehabilitations (30). Contraindications to the use of zygomatic implants include (19):…”

Section: Rehabilitation Of Severely Resorbed Maxillae With Zygomatic mentioning

confidence: 99%

Rehabilitation of severely resorbed maxillae with zygomatic implants: a literature review

Lombardo¹,

Pardo²,

Mascellaro³

et al. 2015

EDUJ

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The use of endosseous implants is a routine treatment modality for replacing missing teeth. However, the use of dental implants is limited by the presence of adequate bone volume permitting their anchorage. Several bone augmentation techniques have been applied to solve this problem. During the last two decades zygomatic implants have become a proposed alternative to bone augmentation procedures for the severely atrophic maxilla. The main advantages of this kind of rehabilitation could be that bone grafting may not be needed and a fixed prosthesis could be applied sooner. Objective: The purpose of this review is to examine the evidence concerning the management of severely resorbed edentulous maxillae using implants placed in the zygomatic bone. Data collection: The articles reported in this literature review were searched on pubmed/medline database, considering only the English-written scientific journals. Outcomes: A Zygomatic Success Code, describing criteria to score the success of a rehabilitation anchored on zygomatic implants, is represented by the outcomes of these variables: implant stability, associated sinus pathology, peri-implant soft tissues condition and prosthetic results. Excellent results were observed for zygomatic implants. Many studies showed an implant survival rate of 100% combined to similar prosthetic results.The cumulative survival rate (CSR) and patients' satisfaction indicate that zygomatic implants could be an effective alternative for the management of an atrophic maxilla and, in some cases, be the only treatment solution. However, there are no well-defined criteria that help the clinician to evaluate this prosthetic rehabilitation. Conclusions: Thus, further studies are necessary to assess the longterm prognosis of the zygoma implant and whether these implants offer some advantages over other techniques for treating atrophic maxillae.

show abstract

Zygomatic and Maxillary Implants Inserted by Means of Computer-Assisted Surgery in a Patient With a Cleft Palate

Cited by 22 publications

References 24 publications

Oral Rehabilitation of Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patient with Simultaneous LeFort I Osteotomy and Zygomatic Implants: A Case Report

Oral Rehabilitation of Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patient with Simultaneous LeFort I Osteotomy and Zygomatic Implants: A Case Report

Dudak Damak Yarikli Hastada Esteti̇k Ve Fonksi̇yonel Proteti̇k Rehabi̇li̇tasyon

Rehabilitation of severely resorbed maxillae with zygomatic implants: a literature review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About