2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b03141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

β-CuGaO2 as a Strong Candidate Material for Efficient Ferroelectric Photovoltaics

Abstract: We propose a recently discovered material, namely, β-CuGaO2 [T. Omata et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 3378] as a strong candidate material for efficient ferroelectric photovoltaics (FPVs). According to first-principles predictions exploiting hybrid density functional, β-CuGaO2 is ferroelectric with a remarkably large remanent polarization of 83.80 μC/cm2, even exceeding that of the prototypic FPV material, BiFeO3. Quantitative theoretical analysis further indicates the asymmetric Ga 3d z 2 –O 2p z hybrid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Their large band gap, which is the reason why they can exhibit large photovoltages, is also the cause of their poor power conversion efficiency, since only a small fraction of the solar spectrum is adsorbed and the photocurrent under visible light is small (∼nA cm -2 ) [30]. A good photoferroic material for visible light absorption should enable the ideal combination of an optical gap in the range of 1-2 eV, high electric polarization, suitable e-h mobility, and good stability [31]. Since 2009, BiFeO 3 (BFO)-based materials have been among the most commonly studied photoferroics [32].…”
Section: Recent Experimental Progressmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their large band gap, which is the reason why they can exhibit large photovoltages, is also the cause of their poor power conversion efficiency, since only a small fraction of the solar spectrum is adsorbed and the photocurrent under visible light is small (∼nA cm -2 ) [30]. A good photoferroic material for visible light absorption should enable the ideal combination of an optical gap in the range of 1-2 eV, high electric polarization, suitable e-h mobility, and good stability [31]. Since 2009, BiFeO 3 (BFO)-based materials have been among the most commonly studied photoferroics [32].…”
Section: Recent Experimental Progressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[27] A good photoferroic material for visible light absorption should enable the ideal combination of an optical gap in the range of 1 − 2 eV, high electric polarization, suitable electron-hole mobility, and good stability. [28] Since 2009, BiFeO 3 (BFO)-based materials are among the most commonly studied photoferroics. [29] BFO has a a band gap of around 2.2 eV, but for optimal photoferroic properties it is desirable to find materials with smaller band gaps.…”
Section: Recent Experimental Progressesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the wide bandgap (typically >3.2 eV) of ferroelectric oxides must be reduced to enhance the absorption of solar spectrum, however the robust and switchable FE polarization of those systems is also believed to be critical in promoting the BPVE. [ 14–20 ] Recently, by engineering the polar order in La‐substituted BiFeO 3 epitaxial thin films, large ferroelectric PV enhancement has been reported. [ 21 ] The substitution of La on the A‐site increases the rotational degree of freedom of the polarization and induces competing polar instabilities allowing formation of a compositional phase boundary between the ferroelectric and non‐polar paraelectric phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, ferroelectric photovoltaics (FPVs) suffer from extremely low photocurrents (on the order of microamperes per square centimeter under 1 sun illumination), which has mainly been attributed to the wide band gap energy (>2.5 eV) of the active-layer materials [e.g., BiFeO 3 (BFO) and Pb(Zr x Ti 1-x )O 3 (PZT)] ( 10 , 11 ). Tremendous efforts have been made to overcome this challenge, utilizing techniques such as band gap tuning ( 5 , 12 14 ), domain structure manipulation ( 2 , 15 ), and multijunction stacking ( 16 , 17 ). Unfortunately, the power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) of FPVs have, until recently, remained too low (≪1%) to be utilized in practical PV applications ( 6 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%