2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

β-FeOOH/C nanocomposite for elemental mercury removal as a new approach to environmental and natural gas processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The broadening and small intensity of the (002) plane may indicate the low degree of orientation of the aromatic layer in the three-dimensional aromatic carbon arrangement, while the broadening in the (001) plane may be related to the small aromatic layer slice in the carbon material (Qiu et al 2019 ). This pattern indicates the presence of amorphous carbon with a low graphitization degree (Ebiad et al 2020 ; Liu et al 2021 ).
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The broadening and small intensity of the (002) plane may indicate the low degree of orientation of the aromatic layer in the three-dimensional aromatic carbon arrangement, while the broadening in the (001) plane may be related to the small aromatic layer slice in the carbon material (Qiu et al 2019 ). This pattern indicates the presence of amorphous carbon with a low graphitization degree (Ebiad et al 2020 ; Liu et al 2021 ).
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adsorption of CS 2 onto the ZC sample could be categorized as physisorption adsorption, with the change in free energy for this process ranging between − 2.14 and − 1.76 kJ.mol −1 . It was reported that the ∆ G ° for chemisorption ranges between − 80 and – 400 kJ.mol −1 and that for physisorption ranges from − 20 to 0 kJ.mol −1 (Ebiad et al 2020 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hence, mathematical models were used to predict the adsorption behavior and patterns within the dynamic soil column. Many mathematical models can be used to analyze adsorption column test results, such as the Bohart–Adams, Bed Depth Service Time, Clark, Wolborska, Thomas, and Yoon–Nelson models, among which the Thomas model has been extensively applied [ 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 ]. The Thomas model is usually adopted to describe the dynamic characteristics of the adsorption column and calculate the saturated adsorption capacity and adsorption rate constant, which are, therefore, applicable to any adsorption system [ 59 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%