2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2014.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

γ+ index: A new evaluation parameter for quantitative quality assurance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The AAPM TG-119 report [14] recommended action levels of 88% and 90% for composite and per field gamma passing rate GP (%) analysis, respectively. However, it only determines the ratio of points out of tolerance without giving any information about the spatial location of points that the dose deviated from in the origin plan, including the volumetric dose deviation for planned target volumes (PTVs) and organ at risk (OAR) of the patient [15]. Some of the recent research showed that γ passing rates of per beam planar IMRT QA did not predict clinically relevant dose errors [16], owing to a lack of correlation between the gamma passing rates (GP (%)and the volumetric dose errors in the anatomic regions-of-interest [17, 18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AAPM TG-119 report [14] recommended action levels of 88% and 90% for composite and per field gamma passing rate GP (%) analysis, respectively. However, it only determines the ratio of points out of tolerance without giving any information about the spatial location of points that the dose deviated from in the origin plan, including the volumetric dose deviation for planned target volumes (PTVs) and organ at risk (OAR) of the patient [15]. Some of the recent research showed that γ passing rates of per beam planar IMRT QA did not predict clinically relevant dose errors [16], owing to a lack of correlation between the gamma passing rates (GP (%)and the volumetric dose errors in the anatomic regions-of-interest [17, 18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several groups have suggested methods of evaluating IMRT QA results through radiobiological as well as physical considerations [ 9 , 10 ]. Sumida et al proposed a method that introduced radiobiological effects by means of TCP and NTCP based on the application of the Niemierko model to physical gamma analysis [ 9 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, an alternative NTCP dataset based on 3D dose–volume information for various organs has been made available (QUANTEC) [ 26 ]. Stathakis et al suggested a new index called gamma plus (by introducing radiobiological information to the gamma index) and applied it to a lung cancer IMRT [ 10 ]. In this method, the radiobiological effect was based on the RS model, which was based on QUANTEC, and the planar dose distributions were evaluated using the biologically effective uniform dose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Trata-se de um método que compara de maneira quantitativa duas distribuições de dose ponto a ponto(STATHAKIS et al, 2014), onde uma distribuição é utilizada como referência e a outra será avaliada. Esse método foi primeiramente proposto por Low e colaboradores(LOW et al, 1998) e utiliza dois critérios nas comparações: um com relação à distância de concordância entre o mesmo valor de dose das duas distribuições e outro…”
unclassified