SummarySalt and water balance and vasopressin secretion were measured in three colonies of SpragueDawley rats. Although sodium and water retention were similar between the groups, there were marked differences in both the rate and diurnal pattern of intake and excretion. Animals housed under semi-barrier conditions showed a lower basal plasma vasopressin concentration but were more sensitive to physiological stimuli.However, since pathogenic status and environmental conditions cannot entirely explain these results, genetic variation is likely to be a contributory factor. Animal science depends to a large extent upon the comparison of data obtained by different research groups on the same strains of animals. The validity of quantitative comparisons may be questioned if inter-colony variations arise from different breeding and housing conditions, or the isolated genetic pools from which the animals were derived. Fluid balance is one parameter affected by such factors. In rats there are marked strain differences in drinking behaviour (Walsh, 1980; Fregly et 01., 1990) and food intake (Walsh, 1980; Rowland & Fregly, 1988) There is some evidence that in man the osmotic threshold for AVP release is affected by genetic or environmental factors (Schrier et 01., 1979). It is therefore conceivable that the differences in salt and water balance, seen between strains, may also occur between separate colonies of the same strain of rat.
KeywordsHaving performed water and salt balance studies on Sprague-Dawley rats at 3 research institutions, we report a retrospective comparison of these parameters from the 3 colonies. Since the secretion of AVP is a major factor in the control of body fluid homeostasis, this comparison also includes data for basal and stimulated plasma AVP concentrations. In addition, there is some evidence for a diurnal variation in AVP secretion (Windle et al., 1992) and therefore the patterns of water and electrolyte turnover have been investigated during the light and dark phases. An attempt was made to interpret the findings in relation to the available information on the pathogenic status and the conditions under which the animals were housed. The first group (colony X) were bred and housed under semi-barrier conditions, as described by Lewin and Hansen (1986), the second (colony Y) under open conditions separated only from other species and the third (colony Z) were purchased from a commercial supplier and housed in isolation.