Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
It is shown that the post-war revival of Ukraine's economy is impossible on the basis of the existing economic model, which is based on the adaptation of domestic industries to the trends in world commodity markets. This model ensured economic "growth without development" and led to the deindustrialization. The need for the formation of an economic model, which will envisage the path to a new industrialization, is substantiated. New industrialization should begin with setting up the industries that could continue the technological chains of commodities production and easily replace imports. The analysis of the structure of domestic GDP use showed that domestic consumption did not become a driver of economic development. The existing economic model does not use exports to develop domestic production and increase the income of population. Therefore, when forming a new model of national economy, it is necessary to take into account the peculiarities of the movement of goods, capital, and labor depending on the waves of globalization and localization of world markets. Since today the world economy has entered a phase of global localization of production, the national development strategy of our country should also focus on creating conditions for the formation of national technological added value chains. To this end, it is necessary to increase a rate of capital accumulation, create new sub-sectors, new added value. The "Marshall Plan" for Ukraine became the main idea for restoring our economic development through the modernization and renewal of production potential. It is proposed that aid recipient countries submit thorough investment projects to a special agency that would establish requirements, criteria and estimates for their financial support. The "Marshall Plan" for Ukraine may become a basis of the national revival strategy, thus, Ukraine must be an active subject in the process of choosing its own development strategy, when its national interests will be realized with the help of this plan.
It is shown that the post-war revival of Ukraine's economy is impossible on the basis of the existing economic model, which is based on the adaptation of domestic industries to the trends in world commodity markets. This model ensured economic "growth without development" and led to the deindustrialization. The need for the formation of an economic model, which will envisage the path to a new industrialization, is substantiated. New industrialization should begin with setting up the industries that could continue the technological chains of commodities production and easily replace imports. The analysis of the structure of domestic GDP use showed that domestic consumption did not become a driver of economic development. The existing economic model does not use exports to develop domestic production and increase the income of population. Therefore, when forming a new model of national economy, it is necessary to take into account the peculiarities of the movement of goods, capital, and labor depending on the waves of globalization and localization of world markets. Since today the world economy has entered a phase of global localization of production, the national development strategy of our country should also focus on creating conditions for the formation of national technological added value chains. To this end, it is necessary to increase a rate of capital accumulation, create new sub-sectors, new added value. The "Marshall Plan" for Ukraine became the main idea for restoring our economic development through the modernization and renewal of production potential. It is proposed that aid recipient countries submit thorough investment projects to a special agency that would establish requirements, criteria and estimates for their financial support. The "Marshall Plan" for Ukraine may become a basis of the national revival strategy, thus, Ukraine must be an active subject in the process of choosing its own development strategy, when its national interests will be realized with the help of this plan.
The legal form of public administration is analyzed, its internal economic content related to material production relations and the objective economic laws immanent in them is investigated. The research methodology is based on the demarcation of the structure and dynamics of the political-economic system, which is consistently carried out by the Odesa School of Economic Theory. It is shown that the political and economic content of public management and administration always has a concrete-historical character. The modern standard of an effective political and economic system is the "mirror symmetry" of its structural and dynamic dependencies. Such "mirror" symmetry is achieved only when the "top-down" dynamic dependence includes all structural levels of the political-economic system in sequence: public management and administration – objective production relations – productive forces of society. If one of these three levels falls out of the "chain" of dynamic dependencies, the system ceases to meet the political and economic requirements of modern development and is unable to find adequate answers to historical challenges. In the modern state-capitalist model of managed development, dynamic dependence is able to cover all three structural levels in the process of consciously using the objective economic laws of capitalism for the development of productive forces, including public management and administration. The practical significance of the research results is related to the justification of the objective necessity for Ukraine of a state-capitalist model of managed development, in which public management and administration are aimed at the conscious use of objective economic laws for the development of productive forces.
The scientific traditions of the Odesa school of political economy, which was created by Professor A.K. Pokrytan, can play a significant role in the further development of the logical-historical approach to the analysis of economic development. The purpose of the article is to consider the scientific traditions of the Odesa school in the context of a kind of historical paradox. This paradox consists in the fact that the most fundamental problem of Ukraine's economy in the 21st century, related to the development of industrial capitalism here, has remained unresolved and, in principle, has not changed since the end of the 19th century. For analyzing this historical paradox, the methodology of the Odesa school of political economy is used, which is based on the consistent distinction between the legal form and the economic content of property, formal and real socialization, genetic and structural foundations of the economic system, its initial and main economic relationship, market economy and industrial capitalism, production relations and institutional forms of management, etc. On the basis of this methodology it is proved, that the main problem of the Ukrainian economy is that the transition to the market does not mean the transition to industrial capitalism, but, on the contrary, is accompanied by the deindustrialization of the national economy. This analysis substantiates the objective necessity of both the new industrialization of the Ukrainian economy and the economic relations of state capitalism as an adequate economic form of this transformational process. This historical necessity is considered in the broad international context of the crisis of globalization and the tendency to localization of production in the world economy. In this way, the article reveals the relevance of the Odesa school methodology in the analysis of both the transitional economy of Ukraine and the modern process of development of the world economy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.