Особенности Цитокинового Баланса У Пациентов С Предраковыми Состояниями Желудка В зависимости От Изменений В Структуре Щитовидной Железы

Mosiychuk, L.М.; Kushnіrenko, І.V.; Кленіна, І.А.; Петішко, О.П.

doi:10.22141/2308-2097.54.3.2020.211732

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In this study, spiral CT combined with enhanced scanning can show the thickness of gastric wall and the depth of invasion in patients with gastric cancer, as well as the TNM staging of gastric cancer. There are many factors that affect the results of the gastric wall test, including differences in patients' own physical constitution, testing equipment, and contrast agents [ 22 ]. During the magnetic resonance imaging examination, the author found that the signal of T1-weighted imaging was equal and slightly higher, and the signal of T2-weighted imaging was slightly higher and higher; at the same time, the folds on the gastric mucosa could be seen.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Diagnostic Value of Spiral CT and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scanning in Gastric Cancer and Precancerous Lesions

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In order to explore the diagnostic value of spiral CT and magnetic resonance imaging scanning in gastric cancer and precancerous lesions, the author selected 56 gastric cancer patients treated in a medical center (group) as the experimental subjects, and all patients underwent MRI, multislice spiral CT scan, and enhanced CT scan two weeks before surgery; at the same time, the gastric cancer staging results of patients were diagnosed according to surgical pathology. All patients were examined under the condition of knowledge and performed breath-holding exercise before examination. The status, location, and extent of tumor lesions were evaluated. In comparison of T staging of gastric cancer patients with magnetic resonance scanning imaging and postoperative pathological examination results, among them, T staging of 3 patients did not match the results of pathological examination, the accuracy rates of T staging on magnetic resonance scanning imaging were T 1 = 94.7 % , T 2 = 87.6 % , T 3 = 91.2 % , and T 4 = 94.7 % , and the total accuracy was 92.1%. Comparison of helical CT scan imaging and postoperative pathological examination results is as follows. Among them, T staging of 8 patients did not match the results of pathological examination, 3 patients were ulcerative, 5 were protuberance, the accuracy rates of T staging in spiral CT scan imaging were T 1 = 90.8 % , T 2 = 82.2 % , T 3 = 76.9 % , and T 4 = 87.6 % , and the total accuracy was 84.5%. The total accuracy rate of imaging N staging was 77.5%, and the total accuracy rate of spiral CT scanning imaging N staging was 80.8%. The accuracy rates of M0 and M1 staging in magnetic resonance imaging were 100.0% and 96.5%, respectively, and the accuracy rates of M0 and M1 staging in spiral CT scan imaging were 96.5% and 96.5%, respectively. The accuracy rate of magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of gastric cancer N staging was 77.4%, and the reason for the low accuracy rate was mainly because the enhancement effect was not obvious due to insufficient enhancement. The accuracy rate of spiral CT in diagnosing N staging of gastric cancer was 80.9%, which was mainly due to the small diameter of the middle celiac artery lymph nodes. Magnetic resonance and spiral CT scans have high value in the early diagnosis and staging of gastric cancer.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%