Провали Державного Регулювання На Ринку Праці Та Можливості Їх Мінімізації

Abstract

International cooperation, the development of the digital economy, and market globalization including the labor market became the reason for the production distribution and the transformation of the sector of employment. The national labor market is under the influence of combined tendencies, which result in diverging effects for its institutional entities. The state meets a number of problems, those restrain the formation of the labor market, which can meet modern economic needs and social challenges. The failures of the state regulation at the labor market are examined and combined into blocks, the main problems of each group (block) are highlighted; their solving will specify the state politics in the sector of employment. The methods of research such as system analysis, comparative analysis, structural-functional analysis, method of statistical aggregation, expert evaluation, etc. are used. The system of failures of state regulation at the labor market is examined. It is structured according to the generalized groups: delayed development and archaic nature of the employment structure, atypicality of labor market adaptation, disequilibrium of the labor market, destruction of social dialogue at the labor market, inequality of incomes, the low level of employment law enforcement. The development entities, manifest particularity, possible negative outcomes, their easing, and the ways out are specified for each group, which characterizes the failures of the state regulation at the labor market. The public policy in the sector of employment, which will form the unique possibility to act in a new way giving the priorities to the new elements, principles, and rules of cooperation at the labor market in the context of uncertainty and perpetual crisis is proposed. The importance of the development of the state regulation strategic course according to the generalized groups, which specifies the manifests of Ukrainian and European labor markets’ divergence is highlighted.

Підходи До Оцінки Втрат У Сфері Зайнятості України Внаслідок Військових Дій

“…аналіз останніх досліджень і публікацій Засади та результати оцінки втрат і збитків, завданих економіці та спільноті в ході збройних протистоянь, на різних етапах світової історії широко висвітлювалися в наукових джерелах, розробках профільних державних і громадських інституцій. У новітньому історичному періоді їх основу складають насамперед дослідження з національної безпеки, сталого розвитку, резильєнтності спектру сфер життєдіяльності країн і територіальних громад, маркетингу і менеджменту підприємства, ризикології [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12].…”

State policy in the field of employment: legal problems and prospects in the conditions of martial law

“…Blyzniuk, et al [2] indicated the inconsistency of the volumes, directions, and quality of specialist training with the structure of demand for qualified labor. The reasons for this are the insufficient attention of institutional structures to the effects of: changes in the sectoral structure of the economy, reduction in the share of heavy industry, changes in the age structure of the workforce due to a sharp decrease in the share of youth, migration on the labor potential of the country.…”