Rumen cannulation is the reference method for collection of representative samples of rumen digesta. However, it is not always viable, which obliges to depend on less invasive techniques, such as stomach tubing. The aim of this work was to study if the differences in fermentation parameters and rumen microbial populations observed between species (sheep and goats), diets (forage and forage plus concentrate) and sampling times (pre-and post-feeding) are consistent when collecting the samples through stomach tube or rumen cannula, in an attempt to validate the use of the former as an alternative to the latter. Four sheep and four goats, fitted with ruminal cannula, were fed either forage (F diet; alfalfa hay) or forage plus concentrate (1:1; FC diet), in two 15-d periods. At the end of each period (d 14 and 15), samples of rumen digesta were taken by stomach tube and rumen cannula, before and 4 hours after morning feeding, for determination of ruminal fermentation parameters (pH, and lactate, ammonia and total VFA concentrations). The three main rumen microbial groups (bacteria, protozoa and methanogenic archaea) and two fibrolytic bacteria (Ruminococcus flavefaciens and Fibrobacter succinogenes) were quantified by real time PCR and, additionally, PCR-DGGE analysis of the bacterial community on the rumen digesta samples collected post-feeding was carried out. Overall, sampling through ruminal cannula and stomach tube gave similar results regarding fermentation parameters when comparing species, diets and sampling times. Despite samples for microbiology assays contained liquid plus solid fractions when collected through rumen cannula and mostly liquid when collected through stomach tube, both techniques showed certain consistency in the effects of treatments on the rumen microbiota (e.g., both revealed no differences between species in total bacteria, archaea and R. flavefaciens concentrations, and higher protozoa numbers in goats than 3 in sheep). However, there was also some discrepancy regarding microorganism concentrations, particularly concerning sampling times (e.g., differences between preand post-feeding samplings were only observed in rumen cannula samples for total bacteria and methanogenic archaea, and in stomach tube samples for R. flavefaciens concentrations). Therefore, this study supports that non-invasive stomach tubing is a feasible alternative to surgical rumen cannulation in sheep and goats to examine ruminal fermentation. Nonetheless, caution should be taken when using this technique to assess the structure and composition of the rumen microbial community.
There are worldwide a number of by-products with a strong potential for use in animal feeding to cover purposes as farm economic profitability enhancement or searching of functional food ingredients. Probably fruit and vegetable industry (i.e. olive milling wastes) are amongst the most representative sectors. Two experiments were performed with lactating Murciano-Granadina goats. In Experiment 1 the objective was to assess the effect of the partial replacement of the forage in the diet with olive by-products or tomato silages supplemented with sunflower oil (SFO, 20 g/kg DM) on the nutrient utilization, rumen fermentation parameters and microbial abundances, methane production and milk yield and composition. Eighteen goats were distributed in three experimental groups and fed control diet (CD) against diets containing olive by-products silage (OBSD) or tomato surplus silage (TSD). Both OBSD and TSD resulted in higher fat intake and apparent digestibility, higher digestible and metabolizable energy and total purine derivatives excretion. The rest of
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.