Eighty-two patients with primary gastric (IE, II1E, and II2E) non-Hodgkin's lymphoma according to the Musshoff's staging system were treated with combined modality including surgery with/without radiotherapy between January 1985 and December 1991. According to the Updated Kiel classification 54 had high-grade histologic subtypes and 28 low-grade. The strategy throughout the study was to resect primary tumor: all patients underwent gastrectomy, 40 subtotal and 42 total gastrectomy. The resection permitted complete surgical staging utilizing three pathologic features: disease confined within or beyond the serosa, negative/positive regional lymph nodes, and negative/positive surgical margins. If there was no evidence of these pathologic factors, the patients who underwent surgery alone received no further radiotherapy. On the other hand, all patients who presented at least one of three pathologic factors were treated with adjuvant radiotherapy after the resection. All except 14 patients presented at least one of the pathologic features and 50 (61%) patients had involvement of the whole gastric wall. Radiotherapy included the gastric bed and para-aortic lymph nodes and, for the patients, who had positive regional lymph nodes in combination with the complete involvement of the gastric wall, the irradiation included the whole abdominal approach. The complete response rate was 97% and the 9-year disease-free survival was 93%. All but one of the 5 relapses occurred within 18 months stressing the need for more specific staging. Gastric resection with/without radiotherapy may still represent the primary therapeutic procedure in early stage gastric non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

No abstract

No abstract

Introduction: Breast cancer is the most common tumor in women and represents the leading cause of cancer death. Radiation therapy plays a key-role in the treatment of all breast cancer stages. Therefore, the adoption of evidence-based treatments is warranted, to ensure equity of access and standardization of care in clinical practice. Method: This national document on the highest evidence-based available data was developed and endorsed by the Italian Association of Radiation and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Breast Cancer Group. We analyzed literature data regarding breast radiation therapy, using the SIGN (Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network) methodology ( www.sign.ac.uk ). Updated findings from the literature were examined, including the highest levels of evidence (meta-analyses, randomized trials, and international guidelines) with a significant impact on clinical practice. The document deals with the role of radiation therapy in the treatment of primary breast cancer, local relapse, and metastatic disease, with focus on diagnosis, staging, local and systemic therapies, and follow up. Information is given on indications, techniques, total doses, and fractionations. Results: An extensive literature review from 2013 to 2021 was performed. The work was organized according to a general index of different topics and most chapters included individual questions and, when possible, synoptic and summary tables. Indications for radiation therapy in breast cancer were examined and integrated with other oncological treatments. A total of 50 questions were analyzed and answered. Four large areas of interest were investigated: (1) general strategy (multidisciplinary approach, contraindications, preliminary assessments, staging and management of patients with electronic devices); (2) systemic therapy (primary, adjuvant, in metastatic setting); (3) clinical aspects (invasive, non-invasive and micro-invasive carcinoma; particular situations such as young and elderly patients, breast cancer in males and cancer during pregnancy; follow up with possible acute and late toxicities; loco-regional relapse and metastatic disease); (4) technical aspects (radiation after conservative surgery or mastectomy, indications for boost, lymph node radiotherapy and partial breast irradiation). Appendixes about tumor bed boost and breast and lymph nodes contouring were implemented, including a dedicated web application. The scientific work was reviewed and validated by an expert group of breast cancer key-opinion leaders. Conclusions: Optimal breast cancer management requires a multidisciplinary approach sharing therapeutic strategies with the other involved specialists and the patient, within a coordinated and dedicated clinical path. In recent years, the high-level quality radiation therapy has shown a significant impact on local control and survival of breast cancer patients. Therefore, it is necessary to offer and guarantee accurate treatments according to the best standards of evidence-based medicine.

Summary Breast cancer is the most frequent type of cancer affecting female patients. The introduction of breast cancer screening programs led to a substantial reduction of mortality from breast cancer. Nevertheless, doubts are being raised on the real efficacy of breast screening programs. The aim of the present paper is to review the main pathological type of cancers detected in breast cancer screening programs. Specifically, attention will be given to: in situ carcinoma, invasive carcinoma histotypes and interval cancer.