BackgroundCapillary malformation-arteriovenous malformation is an autosomal dominant disorder, characterised by capillary malformations and increased risk of fast-flow vascular malformations, caused by loss-of-function mutations in the RASA1 or EPHB4 genes. Around 25% of the patients do not seem to carry a germline mutation in either one of these two genes. Even if other genes could be involved, some individuals may have mutations in the known genes that escaped detection by less sensitive techniques. We tested the hypothesis that mosaic mutations could explain some of previously negative cases.MethodsDNA was extracted from peripheral blood lymphocytes, saliva or vascular malformation tissues from four patients. RASA1 and EPHB4 coding regions and exon/intron boundaries were analysed by targeted custom gene panel sequencing. A second panel and/or Sanger sequencing were used to confirm the identified mutations.ResultsFour distinct mosaic RASA1 mutations, with an allele frequency ranging from 3% to 25%, were identified in four index patients with classical capillary malformation-arteriovenous malformation phenotype. Three mutations were known, one was novel. In one patient, a somatic second hit was also identified. One index case had three affected children, illustrating that the mosaicism was also present in the germline.ConclusionThis study shows that RASA1 mosaic mutations can cause capillary malformation-arteriovenous malformation. Thus, highly sensitive sequencing techniques should be considered as diagnostic tools, especially for patients with no family history. Even low-level mosaicism can cause the classical phenotype and increased risk for offspring. In addition, our study further supports the second-hit pathophysiological mechanism to explain the multifocality of vascular lesions in this disorder.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Purpose To assess the prognostic value of the wall shear stress (WSS) measured in the feeding native arteries upstream from facial superficial arteriovenous malformations (sAVMs). Reliable prognostic criteria are needed to distinguish progressive from stable sAVMs and thus support the indication for an aggressive or a conservative management to avoid severe facial disfigurement. Materials and Methods We prospectively included 25 patients with untreated facial sAVMs, 15 patients with surgically resected sAVMs and 15 controls. All had undergone Doppler ultrasound examination (DUS) with measurements of inner diameters, blood flow velocities, computation of blood flow and WSS of the feeding arteries. Based on the absence or presence of progression in clinical and imaging examinations 6 months after, we discriminated untreated patients as stable or progressive. Results WSS in the ipsilateral external carotid artery was higher in progressive compared to stable sAVMs (15.8 ± 3.3dynes/cm² vs. 9.6 ± 2.0dynes/cm², mean±SD, p < 0.0001) with a cut-off of 11.5dynes/cm² (sensitivity: 92 %, specificity: 92 %, AUC: 0.955, [95 %CI: 0.789–0.998], p = 0.0001). WSS in the ipsilateral facial artery was also higher in progressive compared to stable sAVMs (50.7 ± 14.5dynes/cm² vs. 25.2 ± 7.1dynes/cm², p < 0.0001) with a cut-off of 34.0dynes/cm² (sensitivity: 100 %, specificity: 92 %, AUC: 0.974, [95 %CI: 0.819–1.000], p = 0.0001). The hemodynamic data of operated patients were not different from those of the control group. Conclusion WSS measured in the feeding arteries of an sAVM may be a simple reliable criterion to distinguish stable from progressive sAVMs. This value should be considered to guide the therapeutic strategy as well as the long-term follow-up of patients with facial sAVMs.