Electrons generated in matter by photons could be a fundamental basis for an adequate analysis of radiation effects and damage. We have studied separately the 'primary electrons' generated directly by photons from the 'secondary electrons' (SE) produced by electron-electron interactions. In this work, track-average linear energy transfer, [Formula: see text], of SE in LiF:Mg,Ti and liquid water produced by twelve photon energy beams from 20 kV x-ray to Co gamma rays have been investigated using the EGSnrc Monte Carlo Code. The exposure of LiF:Mg,Ti in different phantom materials has been considered. Depending on the photon energy, SE represent 40%-90% of the total electron fluence (TEF) between 1 keV and 10 keV, being higher when the photon energy increases. Independent of the medium, [Formula: see text] versus mean photon energy displays a local minimum at around 40 keV, followed by a local maximum at ~80 keV-100 keV. The [Formula: see text] of SE generated by the x-ray beams are of order of 11 keV µm to 19 keV µm in LiF:Mg,Ti and 5 keV µm to 9 keV µm in liquid water which represent 3-5 times those produced by Co gamma rays in both media. These values were considerably greater than those of TEF, by factors of 3-8. Furthermore, [Formula: see text] of SE generated in liquid water by 20 kV-200 kV x-rays are similar to those of 76 MeV-120 MeVHe ions. Contrary to the TEF, where [Formula: see text] were independent of the phantom material, at low photon energies [Formula: see text] of SE was found to be sensitive to the surrounding medium showing higher values within the phantom than in air. This result, which agrees with published experimental results, implies the importance of the SE ionization density for an understanding of dosimeter response induced by photon beams.
LiF:Mg,Ti, are widely used to estimate absorbed-dose received by patients during diagnostic or medical treatment. Conveniently, measurements are usually made in plastic phantoms. However, experimental conditions vary from one group to another and consequently, a lack of consensus data exists for the energy dependence of thermoluminescent (TL) response. This work investigated the energy dependence of TLD-100 TL-response and the effect of irradiating the dosimeters in different phantom materials for a broad range of energy photons in an attempt to understand the parameters that affect the discrepancies reported by various research groups. TLD-100s were exposed to 20-300 kV narrow x-ray spectra, (137)Cs and (60)Co photons. Measurements were performed in air, PMMA, wt1, polystyrene and TLDS as surrounding material. Total air-kerma values delivered were between 50 and 150 mGy for x-rays and 50 mGy for (137)Cs and (60)Co beams; each dosimeter was irradiated individually. Relative response, R, defined as the TL-response per air-kerma and relative efficiency, RE, described as the TL-response per absorbed-dose (obtained through Monte Carlo (MC) and analytically) were used to describe the TL-response. Both R and RE are normalized to the responses in a (60)Co beam. The results indicate that the use of different phantom materials affects the TL-response and this response varies with energy and material type. MC simulations reproduced qualitatively the experimental data: a) R increases, reaches a maximum at ~25 keV and decreases; b) RE decreases, down to a minimum at ~60 keV, increases to a maximum at ~150 keV and after decreases. Independent of the phantom materials, RE strongly depends on how the absorbed dose is evaluated and the discrepancies between RE evaluated analytically and by MC simulation are around 4% and 18%, dependent on the photon energy. The comparison between our results and that reported in the literature suggests that the discrepancy observed between different research groups appears to be most likely related to supralinearity effect, phantom materials, difference on the energy-spectra and geometry conditions during each experiment rather than parameters such as heating-rate or annealing procedure, which was supported by MC simulation. From the results obtained in this work and the strict analysis performed, we can conclude that for clinical applications of TLD-100, special attention must be taken when published data are used to convert TL calibration curve from (60)Co to low-energy photons. Otherwise, this can lead to incorrect results when later used to measure absorbed dose in human tissue.
For many years, track-average linear energy transfer (LET), D L , T , has been used to quantify the radiation-induced phenomena in biological and physical systems. However, due to the need for including into the radiotherapy treatment planning system, parameters that are clinical and biologically relevant, a precise knowledge of the dose-average LET, D L , D , becomes essential. Besides, several dosimetric studies have revealed that D L D , is fundamental to describe the dosimeter's response induced by photons. The most important data sets publicly available for D L D , of electron generated by photons are those reported for measurements performed in methane-based tissue-equivalent gas. However, comparing to liquid water, the electron spectra generated by low photon energy might not be similar due to the photoelectric effect. Thus, this work aimed at investigating the D L D , of electron spectra generated in liquid water and LiF:Mg,Ti by ten x-ray beams from 20 kV to 300 kV, 137 Cs and 60 Co gamma. The results suggest that D L D , is more sensitive to the surrounding environment than D L T , and consequently, it might be a more appropriate parameter to quantify the radiation effect and damage in matter induced by photons. Besides, good agreement (6% to 12% differences versus 10% to 15% uncertainties in the experiments) was observed between the data obtained in this work for liquid water and the experimental values published for methane-based tissue-equivalent gas at energies above 60 keV. Whereas at lowest energies, the minimum difference is around 18% which can be associated to the difference between the two media.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.