BackgroundRecent studies show that Aminaphtone is effective in the treatment of Raynaud’s phenomenon (RP) symptoms in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc), and an increase in peripheral blood perfusion was demonstrated by Laser speckle contrast analysis in treated patients (1,2). Unfortunately, the drug is only available in a few countries.ObjectivesTo evaluate long-term tolerability and safety of Aminaphtone in SSc patients with secondary RP.MethodsSeventy SSc patients (EULAR/ACR criteria) (mean disease duration 8±7 years, mean age 61±10 years) who started Aminaphtone treatment due to active RP were enrolled and followed for at least 4 years. Patients were also taking various concomitant treatments, including immunomodulators, cyclic intravenous iloprost, endothelin receptor antagonists and aspirin. None was taking sildenafil or selexipag. Survival of Aminaphtone in therapy was assessed along with possible drug-related side effect. The Raynaud condition score (RCS) to asses disease severity and blood examinations were routinely performed.ResultsThe mean follow-up of patients was 49±11 months. Aminaphtone was orally administered at 75 mg twice daily, as standard initial posology in our clinical practice. During the follow-up, six patients (8,6%) referred headache as side effect and had to reduce Aminaphtone posology to 75 mg per day, while maintaining clinical benefits. No other side effect related to the drug was observed during the follow-up. Seven patients increased the posology to 75 mg three times daily due to poor effectiveness, and further seven patients increased the posology to 75 mg three times daily only during the colder months of the year. Conversely, thirty-five patients reduced the dosage to 75 mg once daily only during the hottest months of the year, due to partial remission of the RP. During follow-up, blood tests did not reveal any significant alteration ascribable to Aminaphtone. A subjective improvement of Raynaud’s symptoms (assessed by the RCS) was already evident after 1-2 months of treatment in fifty-six patients (80%). Globally, the patients referred a sustained improvement followed by stabilization of Raynaud’s symptoms during the follow-up.ConclusionDuring an average observation period of four years, Aminaphtone showed a good tolerability and safety profile along with sustained efficacy in patients with SSc-related RP, without disabling or serious side effects. A randomized controlled trial for Aminaphtone use in the management of SSc-related RP is desirable to better assess the clinical efficacy of the drug over time.References[1]Parisi S, et al. Am J Int Med. 2015;3:204–209. 2. Ruaro B et al. 2019. Front Pharmacol 10:293.Disclosure of InterestsANDREA CERE: None declared, Emanuele Gotelli: None declared, Adriano Lercara: None declared, Carmen Pizzorni: None declared, Sabrina Paolino: None declared, Elisa Alessandri: None declared, Maurizio Cutolo Grant/research support from: Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Alberto Sulli: None declared

No abstract

Background: Specific autoantibodies and nailfold videocapillaroscopy (NVC) findings are serum and morphological diagnostic hallmarks of systemic sclerosis (SSc) as well as useful biomarkers which stratify the microvascular progression and prognosis of patients. Methods: The aim of our narrative review is to provide an update and overview of the link between SSc-related autoantibodies, used in clinical practice, and microvascular damage, evaluated by NVC, by exploring the interaction between these players in published studies. A narrative review was conducted by searching relevant keywords related to this field in Pubmed, Medline and EULAR/ACR conference abstracts with a focus on the findings published in the last 5 years. Results: Our search yielded 13 clinical studies and 10 pre-clinical studies. Most of the clinical studies (8/13, 61.5%) reported a significant association between SSc-related autoantibodies and NVC patterns: more specifically anti-centromere autoantibodies (ACA) were associated more often with an “Early” NVC pattern, whereas anti-topoisomerase autoantibodies (ATA) more frequently showed an “Active” or “Late” NVC pattern. Five studies, instead, did not find a significant association between specific autoantibodies and NVC findings. Among the pre-clinical studies, SSc-related autoantibodies showed different mechanisms of damage towards both endothelial cells, fibroblasts and smooth muscle vascular cells. Conclusions: The clinical and laboratory evidence on SSc-related autoantibodies and microvascular damage shows that these players are interconnected. Further clinical and demographic factors (e.g., age, sex, disease duration, treatment and comorbidities) might play an additional role in the SSc-related microvascular injury whose progression appears to be complex and multifactorial.

Objective. We aimed to investigate the clinical off-label use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), including its safety and efficacy in patients with rare and complex rheumatic connective tissue diseases (rCTDs). Methods. A survey was distributed across experts from ERN-ReCONNET reference centres to assess the experience with MMF off-label use. Patientlevel data of patients with rCTDs under treatment with MMF was also collected for analysis of safety and efficacy. Results. Twelve experts from eleven centres distributed throughout Europe (7 countries) answered the survey. The experience was concordant in that, despite its off-label use, experts reported opting frequently for this therapeutic alternative with robust confidence on its efficacy and safety. The analysis of 108 patients with rCTDs under MMF revealed a good safety profile, as well as good clinical outcomes, especially for systemic lupus erythematosus and idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. The presence of interstitial lung disease was, as expected, associated with a worse clinical outcome despite use of MMF. Conclusion. MMF is widely used in reference centres for rCTDs. Its safety profile and efficacy seem to be recognised by experts and demonstrated with patient-level analysis. While selected rCTDs will likely remain an off-label indication for MMF, robust data seem to support this therapy as an appropriate alternative for safely and effectively treating many manifestations of rCTDs.