In 192 oocyte donation cycles performed between January 1993 and July 1996, we examined the width of 'the window for embryo transfer' using standard hormonal replacement methods. All transfers were performed within 48 h of insemination. We varied the day of embryo transfer with regard to the initiation of progesterone therapy and, thus, the duration of endometrial exposure to progesterone and analysed the resulting pregnancy rates. Patients were divided into five groups (I-V) and embryo transfers were performed 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6 days following initiation of progesterone therapy. The number of pregnancies per transfer cycle achieved in groups I-V were 0 (0%), 3 (12%), 16 (40%), 29 (48.3%), and 10 (20.4%) respectively. The increased pregnancy rate in group III in comparison to group II is statistically significant (P < 0.03). Furthermore, the pregnancy rate in group IV (5 days of progesterone administration before embryo transfer) was significantly higher than in group V (6 days of progesterone administration before embryo transfer; P < 0.005). We also noted that, when embryos were transferred 4 or 5 days after initiation of progesterone therapy, the pregnancy rates were not significantly different between menopausal and cycling recipients (50% vs 43.7%). Our results indicate that the window for embryo transfer is dependent on duration of treatment with progesterone; it begins approximately 48 h after starting progesterone administration and lasts for approximately 4 days. The optimum period for transferring embryos at the 4- to 8-cell stage corresponds to cycle days 18 and 19. Transfers performed on the 17th and 20th days of the cycle can result in successful implantation, although the rates of implantation are highest when transfers are done on days 18 and 19.

Males with abnormal karyotypes and subgroups of fertile and infertile males with normal karyotypes may be at risk of producing unbalanced or aneuploid spermatozoa. Biological, clinical, environmental and other factors may also cause additional sperm aneuploidy. However, increased risk of sperm aneuploidy is directly related to chromosomally abnormal embryo production and hence to poor reproductive potential. This systemic literature review focuses on the identification of these males because this is an essential step in the context of assisted reproduction. This research may allow for a more personalised and, hence, more accurate estimation of the risk involved in each case, which in turn will aid genetic counselling for affected couples and help with informed decision-making.

Microinjection of spermatids into oocytes has proven to be a successful assisted reproduction procedure in the animal model. In the human, low fertilization and cleavage to the 4-cell stage were reported after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with round spermatids. In comparison with a conventional ICSI-testicular sperm extraction (TESE) programme, the implantation rate after round spermatid injection is dramatically low. Different problems have been encountered during the development of the spermatid injection technique and they could be partially responsible for the lower outcome when using round spermatids. Compared with the round spermatid cells, spermatids in the elongation phase are easy to isolate and identify from other round cells present in a wet preparation. The morphological identification does not reveal anything about the viability or the genetic normality of the round spermatids. Severe testicular dysfunction may have consequences on the quality of the few spermatogenic cells present. Others factors, such as the pathology of the patient, play an important role in the successful treatment. Even if the results are extremely low, spermatid injection seems more favourable for men who have already proven their capacity to produce some spermatozoa. A spermatogenic block at the round spermatid level has led to early abortions, increasing the suspicion of the role of a genetic factor. In order for this technique to be safe for use in clinics, more intensive work is needed to improve the selection and handling of cells and to ascertain the genomic imprinting and gene expression necessary for embryonic development. Hence, when using immature cells for conception, the screening of the patient and the follow-up of the pregnancies and babies should be mandatory.

No abstract

No abstract