BACKGROUND: Fluorosis is intrinsic tooth discoloration which compromises esthetics depending on its severity. AIM: The aim of the study was to assess the efficiency of various treatment modalities in esthetic improvement of mild fluorosed teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four patients with 48 mild fluorosed teeth were randomly assigned to four treatment modalities (n = 12). The modalities included M1: power bleaching, M2: microabrasion and power bleaching, M3: power bleaching and resin infiltration and M4: microabrasion, power bleaching and resin infiltration. Color parameters (L, a, b) and visible color change (ΔE) were measured by spectrophotometer (VITA Easyshade®) at baseline, immediately after the treatment, after 3, 6, and 9 months. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Two-way ANOVA was applied to test the interaction between different variables. ANOVA repeated measures were followed by Duncan multiple range tests (DMRTs) to compare between groups. RESULTS: All the treatment modalities showed significant color change (ΔE) at all-time points compared to baseline. The highest color change was recorded in the resin infiltration treatment modalities compared to the other treatment modalities. Bleaching alone had the lowest change. CONCLUSION: Resin infiltration treatment modalities were more effective in the esthetic improvement of dental fluorosis compared to either power bleaching alone or combination of microabrasion and power bleaching.
BACKGROUND: Various treatment modalities are available to improve esthetics of fluorosed teeth based on its severity. AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical performance of different minimal invasive treatment protocols on mild to moderate fluorosed teeth. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Before the interventions, tooth color coordinates L, a and b were recorded for 160 fluorosed teeth by Vita Easyshade V. Participants were randomly allocated in eight treatment protocols with 20 teeth (n = 20) included in each protocol. Protocol one (P1) Opalescence boost PF 40%. Protocol two (P2) Opalustre. Protocol three (P3) MI-Paste Plus. In protocol four (P4) teeth were treated with Opalustre followed by Opalescence boost PF 40%. In protocol five (P5) Opalescence boost PF 40% was applied followed by MI-Paste Plus, while in protocol six (P6) Opalustre was applied followed by MI-Paste Plus whereas protocol seven (P7) teeth were treated with Opalustre, followed by Opalescence boost PF 40% and finally MI-Paste Plus. Protocol eight (P8) control. All teeth were evaluated immediately for color change (ΔE) after treatment (T1), after 14 days (T2), after 3 months (T3) and after 6 months (T4). Color change (ΔE) was calculated from ΔL, Δa, and Δb recorded at each evaluation time point. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Two-way ANOVA was applied to test the interaction between different variables. ANOVA repeated measures were followed by Duncan multiple range tests (DMRTs) to compare between groups. RESULTS: In accordance to time, all treatment protocols showed significant color change can be recognized by unexperienced eye (ΔE ≥ 3.7). Immediately after application (T1), the highest color change (ΔE) was recorded in P7. While at 14 days and 3 months follow ups, color change in P4 exceeded P7. After 6 months the highest ΔE was recorded in both P4 and P7 with no significant difference between them. Meanwhile, in Accordance to treatment Protocol, The highest color change was recorded at 3 months (T3) in all treatment protocols. These records were preserved at 6 months follow-up (T4) for all treatment protocols except P1 and P3. CONCLUSION: Combined treatment protocols of Opalustre and Opalescence boost PF 40% have the highest effect on ΔE regardless of using MI-Paste Plus. MI-Paste Plus provides stability of ΔE results at 6 months’ follow-up.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.