SUMMARYThe ability of pig suppliers to separate pigs with abnormalities from pigs without abnormalities at the end of the finishing period was investigated Nineteen hundred and seventy-eight pigs, delivered by 22 pig suppliers, were involved in the experiment The pigs were inspected on the farm by the pig supplier and separately, by a veterinary expert The animals were sent in 22 deliveries to one slaughterhouse. A veterinary meat inspector carried out the ante-and post-mortem inspections. The results of the inspections were compared The measure of agreement,

SUMMARYIn a field trial on Integrated Quality Control offinishing pigs we evaluated information written on Quality Information Cards (QUIC) for meat inspection purposes. These cards were sent with 3747 shipments of pigs going from the finishing herd to the slaughterhouse. Pig suppliers answered five questions dealing with health problems and the use of drugs during the finishing period By comparing QUIC answers to recorded post-mortem abnormalities, we found that the information on the QUIC had some, albeit low, predictive value with respect to the abnormalities 'arthritis', 'condemned liver' and lung lesions. Shipments without a QUIC or with a faulty QUIC were considered 'suspect' because higher levels of abnormalities were found in these shipments. These results indicate the potential use of a QUIC.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract