spontaneously (SC), with Clomid treatment (CT), intrauterine insemination after controlled ovarian stimulation (IUI+COS) or invitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET). Follow-up was up to 3 years. Paired test and Chi-Square analysis were used for statistical analysis and logistic regression was used to further examine any statistical significant bivariate analysis involving pregnancy. RESULTS: Mean age in years was significantly lower in Group 1 compared to Group 2) respectively (p ¼ 0.007). There was no significant difference in duration of infertility in years, day 3 FSH levels, and BMI in kg/m 2 between the two groups. There was significantly higher incidence of primary infertility [p ¼ 0.05], and endometriosis [p ¼ 0.026], and significantly lower incidence of male factor infertility [p ¼ 0.012] in Group 1 vs Group 2 respectively. There was no significant difference in the incidence of ovulatory disorders, tubal factor, and history of miscarriage between the two groups. There was a significantly higher clinical pregnancy (68.8% vs 57.5%), and delivery/ongoing pregnancy (60.0% vs 50.7%) rates in Group 1 compared to Group 2 (p ¼ 0.002 and p ¼ 0.011 respectively). There was no significant difference in miscarriage (11.1% vs 10.6%), ectopic (1.0% vs 0.6%), and multiple birth (27.5% vs 25.5%) rates between the two groups. There was significantly lower percentage of patients who conceived with IVF/ET and significantly higher percentage of patients who conceived spontaneously in Group 1 compared to Group 2 (p ¼ 0.000). Using logistic regression, group and age were still significant factors in predicting pregnancy even when also considering primary infertility, endometriosis, and male factor infertility. CONCLUSION: After hysteroscopy correction the reproductive outcome of infertile patients with incomplete uterine septum is better than those with arcuate uterine anomaly. However, surgical correction of both such anomalies improves reproductive potential in infertile patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.