Eleven women (age = 24.4 +/- 6.3 yr, mass = 65.0 +/- 7.8 kg, height = 167 +/- 8 cm, body fatness = 22.4 +/- 5.9%, mean +/- SD) were immersed to neck level in 18 degrees C water for up to 90 min for comparison of their thermal responses with those of men (n = 14) in a previous similarly conducted protocol. Metabolic rate increased about three times resting levels in men and women, whereas the rate of rectal temperature cooling (DeltaT(re)/Deltat) in women (0.47 degrees C/h) was about one-half that in men. With use of all data, DeltaT(re)/Deltat correlates with the ratio of body surface area to size and the metabolic rate of shivering correlates inversely to the square root of body fatness. No significant gender differences in total metabolic heat production normalized for body mass or surface area were found among subjects who completed 90 min of immersion (9 women and 7 men). Nor was there a gender difference in the overall percent contribution ( approximately 60%) of fat oxidation to total heat production. Blood concentrations of free fatty acids, glycerol, beta-hydroxybutyrate, and lactate increased significantly during the 90-min immersion, whereas muscle glycogen sampled from the right quadriceps femoris vastus lateralis decreased (free fatty acids, glycerol, and beta-hydroxybutyrate were higher in women). When the subjects were subgrouped according to similar body fatness and 60 min of immersion (6 women and 5 men), no significant gender differences emerged in DeltaT(re)/Deltat, energy metabolism, and percent fat oxidation. These findings suggest that no gender adjustments are necessary for prediction models of cold response if body fatness and the ratio of body surface area to size are taken into account and that a potential gender advantage with regard to carbohydrate sparing during cold water immersion is not supported.

Measurements of core temperature (Tc) at different sites produce on some occasions different cooling curves in cold-exposed humans, suggesting that the corresponding thermometric heat debts (HD) could be equally different when calculated by conventional methods [via the change in either Tc or mean body temperature (Tb)]. The present study also compared these thermometric HD values with the calorimetric HD obtained by partitional calorimetry (S). Nine subjects who showed similar initial but different final Tc [rectal (Tre) and auditory canal temperatures (Tac)] during nude cold exposure (2 h at 1 degrees C at rest) were used. Tc-derived HD corresponded to a heat gain of 12 +/- 21 kJ and an HD of 78 +/- 20 kJ with use of Tre and Tac, respectively, whereas the Tb-derived HD varied from 266 +/- 35 to less than or equal to 1,479 +/- 71 kJ with the use of various well-known Tb weighing coefficients. In contrast, S corresponded to 504 +/- 79 kJ, a level that could have been obtained only if the thermoneutral/cold Tb weighing coefficients had been 0.818/0.818 for Tre and 0.865/0.865 for Tac. The results demonstrate that calculation by conventional methods can markedly overestimate or underestimate HD. These differences could not be explained by the site chosen to represent Tc, inasmuch as about the same effect was observed with use of either Tre or Tac. It is concluded that the thermometric value of HD in the cold is not, at least under the present conditions, as accurate and reliable as S.

No abstract

Cold stress and caffeine ingestion are each reported to increase plasma catecholamines, free fatty acid (FFA) concentrations, and energy metabolism. This study examined the possible interaction of these two metabolic challenges in four double-blind counterbalanced trials. Young adult men (n = 6) ingested caffeine (5 mg/kg) or placebo (dextrose, 5 mg/kg) and rested for 2 h in 28 or 5 degrees C air. Cold stress alone elevated (P less than 0.05) plasma norepinephrine, metabolism (O2 consumption, VO2), and respiratory exchange ratio (RER). Caffeine alone increased (P less than 0.05) plasma epinephrine and FFA but not RER. When the two challenges were combined (caffeine plus 5 degrees C for 2 h) norepinephrine and epinephrine were increased (P less than 0.05) as was FFA. However, VO2, RER, and skin and rectal temperatures were not different from the responses observed at 5 degrees C after placebo ingestion. The data suggest that caffeine selectively increases plasma epinephrine, whereas cold air increases norepinephrine. During the cold exposure, increasing epinephrine and FFA above normal levels did not appear to influence the metabolic or thermal responses to the cold stress. In fact the increase in RER suggested a greater carbohydrate oxidation.

The influence of a thermogenic mixture of ephedrine- (1 mg/kg) caffeine (2.5 mg/kg) on cold tolerance was investigated in nine healthy young male subjects during two seminude exposures to cold air (3 h at 10 degrees C). The drug ingestion reduced the total drop in core, mean skin, and mean body temperatures (P less than 0.01), thus producing significantly warmer final core, mean skin, and mean body temperatures compared with the placebo ingestion. The drug ingestion increased the total 3-h energy expenditure by 18.6% compared with that of the placebo ingestion in the cold (P less than 0.01). By means of the nonprotein respiratory exchange ratio to calculate the rates of substrate oxidation, it was found that the drug ingestion increased carbohydrate oxidation by as much as 41.7% above that of the placebo (P less than 0.05). In contrast, the drug mixture had no significant influence on lipid or protein metabolism. The results demonstrate that the ingestion of an ephedrine-caffeine mixture improves cold tolerance in humans by significantly increasing body temperatures in the cold. These improvements were not caused by an increased conservation of heat but by a greater energy expenditure, which appears to be dependent on an enhanced carbohydrate utilization.