BackgroundColorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide and is associated with high mortality when detected at a later stage. There is a paucity of studies from low and middle income countries to support the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening. We aim to analyze the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening compared to no screening in Ukraine, a lower-middle income country.MethodsWe developed a deterministic Markov cohort model to assess the cost-effectiveness of three colorectal cancer screening strategies [fecal occult blood test (FOBT) every year, flexible sigmoidoscopy with FOBT every 5 years, and colonoscopy every 10 years] compared to no screening. We modeled outcomes in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) over a lifetime time horizon. We performed sensitivity analyses on treatment adherence, test characteristics and costs. Analyses were conducted from the perspective of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine.ResultsThe base-case lifetime cost-effectiveness analysis showed that all three screening strategies were cost saving compared to no screening, and among the three strategies, colonoscopy every 10 years was the dominant strategy compared to no screening with standard adherence to treatment. When decreased adherence to treatment was modeled, colonoscopy every 10 years was the most cost-effective strategy with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $843 per QALY compared with no screening.ConclusionOur findings indicate that colorectal cancer screening can save money and improve health compared to no screening in Ukraine. Colonoscopy every 10 years is superior to the other screening modalities evaluated in this study. This knowledge can be used to concentrate efforts on developing a national screening program in Ukraine.
Since the first attempts at resecting parts of diseased livers in the late nineteenth century, hemorrhage has been the main obstacle for surgeons. One of the first hemostasis techniques in liver resection was liver suture. The idea of suturing the liver in order to perform resection was proposed by a team of Russian and Polish surgeons from Kharkiv University in today's Ukraine. The liver suture became widely popular and has been used in various forms throughout the surgical world. Further into the twentieth century, it has lost much of its popularity; however, over more than 100 years of existence it has seen several peaks in interest. Currently, it is still being used by some liver surgeons as it is one of the cheapest ways of obtaining a bloodless liver parenchyma transection.
Background: Intraoperative ultrasound examination (IOUS) is indispensable part of modern surgical interventions in tumors of hepatopancreatobiliary zone. In this study retrospective analysis of IOUS efficiency in surgical treatment of pancreatic tumors was provided. Materials and Methods: In the period from January 2013 till November 2015 in the National Cancer Institute IOUS was applied during 76 surgical interventions: for pancreatic head tumors — in 46 (60.5%) patients, for body/tail pancreatic tumors — in 20 (26.3%) patients, in 10 (13.2%) patients — for periampullary zone neoplasms. In IOUS we performed primary tumor assessment (localization, degree of tumor spreading to superior mesenteric vessels, hepatoduodenal ligament vessels, additional foci occurrence in pancreas), and liver metastases detection. Surgical interventions were performed: pancreatoduodenectomy in 52 (68.4%) patients, radical antegrade modal pancreatosplenectomy — in 14 (18.4%) patients. Results: IOUS allowed determining additional tumor foci in pancreas in 2 (2.6%) patients, in 8 (10.5%) observations tumor invasion into portal or superior mesenteric vein was determined. In 21 (27.6%) patient additional hepatic neoplasms were detected (in half of cases — 11.8%, metastases). These findings resulted in change of surgical intervention extent in 23 (30.3%) patients: expansion to combined resections in 14 (18.4%) patients, reduction to symptomatic operations in 5 (6.6%) cases, organ-preserving operations were performed in 4 (5.3%) patients. Variant anatomy of hepatic arterial blood supply was determined in 41 (53.9%) patients that necessitated performance correction of resection stages for preservation of adequate hepatic blood supply. Conclusions: IOUS is a highly-precise diagnostic method substantively influencing operation course in pancreatic tumors, enabling surgeon to provide adequate staging and permanent correction of operation course.
Background Preliminary study results demonstrated parenchyma-sparing surgery (PSS) as an effective approach which allowed to remove colorectal cancer (CRC) metastatic lesions within the central liver cites and increased the probability of the liver re-resections. Methods The prospective analysis re-evaluation of the 185 CRC patients surgical treatment has been performed. Results An overall 5-year survival (OS) of the 185 enrolled patients was 43 ± 7%, and the mean and median value for OS was 48.7 ± 1.9% and 55.2 ± 5 (95% CI: 44.4–66.1) months. The 5-year OS for CRC patients whose metastatic lesions were predominantly located within peripheral and central liver segments was 56 ± 8% and 27 ± 9%, respectively (p = 0.08). A 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates of patients with peripheral and central liver cites metastatic lesions were 31 ± 7 % and 15 ± 7%, p = 0,12. And the DFS median was 34.2 and 46.5 months for R1v and R0 cohorts, respectively, p = 0.62. Conclusions Parenchyma-sparing surgery should be a priority pathway for complex treatment of patients with deeply located lesions of the right liver lobe. Trial registration The study is registered in https://www.researchregistry.com/browse-the-registry#home/registrationdetails/5ed9f60863e9bf0016624456/, no. 5679.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.