The antimicrobial effect of sitafloxacin (DU-6859a), used either singly or in combination with rifampicin, was evaluated in vitro against Mycobacterium ulcerans. Growth of M. ulcerans was measured by plate counts and the BACTEC radiometric method. The MICs and MBCs of sitafloxacin for M. ulcerans were in the range 0.125-0.5 mg/L. The values for other fluoroquinolones were two- to four-fold higher than for sitafloxacin. Combination of sitafloxacin and rifampicin exhibited synergy with five of the eight strains, whereas the combination of ofloxacin and rifampicin resulted in additive effects only. These results suggest that the combination of sitafloxacin and rifampicin has potential in the treatment of M. ulcerans infection.
Existing data on adenosine triphosphate (ATP) pools in microbes are deficient for two reasons: (i) incomplete extractions of ATP, and (ii) the failure to take into account that the adverse effects of extracting procedures on standard ATP exert analogous effects on the ATP released from bacterial cells. Methods for correcting observed yields and calculating ATP pools have been demonstrated. Three bacterial species were used in the studies on extraction of ATP: Escherichia coli, Mycobacterium phlei, and Mycobacterium lepraemurium. Perchloric acid and n-butanol were disqualified because of their failure to extract total bacterial ATP even from E. coli and because of inconvenient procedures. The new extraction procedure had minimal effects on standard ATP, liberated 100% of the ATP pools from the three representative species of microbes, and caused no ionic imbalance or quenching of bioluminescence. This method involves vortexing of cell suspensions for 10 s with 23% chloroform (vol/vol), heating at 98 C for the required time (E. coli, 3 min; M. phlei, 5 min; M. lepraemurium, 10 min) and then 1 min at 98 C with vacuum to dry the samples. Heat or chloroform alone may suffice for some microbes and release total ATP from plant and animal cells.
The activities of four newly synthesized benzoxazinorifamycin derivatives, either alone or in combination with ofloxacin, against strains of Mycobacterium leprae were determined by assessing their effects on two biochemical parameters of metabolic activity which served as surrogate markers for growth in vitro. KRM-1648 and KRM-2312 were the most active agents tested against both a rifampicin-susceptible isolate (MICs of 0.05 and 0.1 mg/L respectively) and a rifampicin-resistant isolate (MICs of 0.2 and 0.3 mg/L respectively); both compounds were more active than either rifampicin or rifabutin. The activities of the two other derivatives, KRM-1657 and KRM-1668, against a rifampicin- susceptible strain (MICs of 0.3 mg/L) were similar to that of rifampicin, while the MIC of each of these agents for the rifampicin-resistant strain was 1.0mg/L. In common with rifabutin, both of the more active derivatives demonstrated synergy with ofloxacin against the rifampicin-susceptible isolates. The results of this study suggest that these compounds, in combination with ofloxacin as part of multidrug regimens, warrant further evaluation as treatment for patients with leprosy.
The efficacy of three fluorinated quinolones, clinafloxacin (PD 127391), sparfloxacin (PD 131501) and PD 131628, either alone or in combination with rifampicin/rifabutin, against Mycobacterium leprae was evaluated in vitro using two biochemical parameters to measure the metabolic activity of the organism. Clinafloxacin was found to be most effective with an MIC of 0.75 mg/L, followed by sparfloxacin (MIC 1.5 mg/L) and PD131628 (MIC 3.0 mg/L). When combined with rifampicin each of the three quinolones were additive to the activity. However, when combined with rifabutin, both clinafloxacin and sparfloxacin demonstrated pronounced synergic activity. Incorporation of clinafloxacin and rifabutin in a multi-drug therapy regimen is suggested.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.