No abstract

It is believed that the men examined were representative of the normal population of young men in all four countries as they were recruited from groups attending a compulsory medical examination, and not selected for known fertility or semen quality. Moreover, the majority of participants had no prior knowledge of their fertility potential. It appears that an east-west gradient exists in the Nordic-Baltic area with regard to semen parameters, this being in parallel with the incidences of testicular cancer. Further investigations are required to determine whether these findings are due to genetic differences, to different environments, or perhaps to a combination of both factors.

Recent reports have indicated a decrease in semen quality of men in some countries, and suggested regional differences. A study was undertaken of semen samples from 1082 fertile men from four European cities (Copenhagen, Denmark; Paris, France; Edinburgh, Scotland; and Turku, Finland). Semen analysis was standardized, inter-laboratory differences in assessment of sperm concentration were evaluated, and morphology assessment centralized. Lowest sperm concentrations and total counts were detected for Danish men, followed by French and Scottish men. Finnish men had the highest sperm counts. Men from Edinburgh had the highest proportion of motile spermatozoa, followed by men from Turku, Copenhagen and Paris. Only the differences between Paris/Edinburgh and Paris/Turku were statistically significant (P < 0.003 and P < 0.002 respectively). No significant differences in morphology were detected. A general seasonal variation in sperm concentration (summer 70% of winter) and total sperm count (summer 72% of winter) was detected. Semen quality of a 'standardized' man (30 years old, fertile, ejaculation abstinence of 96 h) were estimated. Typically, sperm concentrations (x 10(6)/ml) for winter/summer were: Turku 132/93; Edinburgh 119/84; Paris 103/73; and Copenhagen 98/69. These differences in semen quality may indicate different environmental exposures or lifestyle changes in the four populations. However, it remains to be seen whether such changes can account for these differences. These data may also serve as a reference point for future studies on time trends in semen quality in Europe.

This retrospective study of 1001 in-vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles included a consecutive series of single transfers (n = 341), dual transfers (n = 410) and triple transfers (n = 250) where all the transferred embryos in each cycle were of identical quality score and identical cleavage stage. In our 2 day culture system, transfer of 4-cell embryos resulted in a significantly higher implantation rate and pregnancy rate (23 and 49%) compared with 2-cell embryos (12 and 22%) and 3-cell embryos (7 and 15%). Furthermore, the transfer of 4-cell embryos resulted in a significantly higher pregnancy rate compared with embryos that had cleaved beyond the 4-cell stage (28%). The implantation rate (21%) and pregnancy rate (43%) after transfer of embryos of score 1.0 were significantly higher than after transfer of embryos of score 2.0 (14 and 32% respectively). Transferring embryos of score 2.1 resulted in significantly higher implantation rates (26%) and similar pregnancy rates compared with score 1.0. Transferring embryos of score 2.2-3.0 resulted in a significantly lower implantation rate (5%) and pregnancy rate (15%). A striking finding was that embryos of quality score 2.0 had a significantly lower implantation rate compared with embryos of quality score 1.0 and 2.1 and a significantly lower pregnancy rate compared to embryos of quality score 1.0. We also found a lower implantation rate and pregnancy rate when transferring 3-cell embryos. These findings may indicate periods of increased sensitivity to damage during the cell cycle. In conclusion, these results substantiate the idea of the superiority of 4-cell embryos and demonstrate that minor amounts of fragments in the embryo may not be of any importance. These findings may call for a shift when weighing the two main morphological components (quality score and cleavage stage) in the sense that reaching a 4-cell cleavage stage even with the presence of a minor amount of fragments should be preferred to a 2-cell embryo with no fragments.

The cross border phenomenon is now well entrenched. The data show that many patients travel to evade restrictive legislation in their own country, and that support from their home health providers is variable. There may be a need for professional societies to establish standards for cross border reproductive care.