Atherosclerosis is the major cause of death in the diabetic population. Hyperglycaemia per se is an independent risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease, in spite of the coexistence of other known risk factors, such as hyperlipidaemia and hypertension [1,2]. Elevated concentrations of low density lipoproteins (LDL) are also a major risk factor in the general population [3,4]. However, LDL levels are usually normal in both insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) and non-insulin-dependent diabetes (NIDDM) [2,5].It has been postulated that the increased cardiovascular risk for diabetic patients could be related, among other factors, to LDL qualitative modifications such as oxidation and glycation. These modifications impair LDL cellular catabolism, leading to loss of affinity for LDL receptors in fibroblasts, increased accumulation of cholesteryl esters in macrophages, and immunological responses [6,7]. In Diabetologia (1996) Summary We evaluated the effect of improving glycaemic control with intensive insulin therapy on LDL susceptibility to oxidation, electronegative LDL proportion, and LDL subfraction phenotype in a group of 25 patients with short-duration insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM); 25 matched healthy control subjects were also studied. LDL susceptibility to oxidation was measured by continuous monitoring of conjugated diene formation. Electronegative LDL was isolated by anion exchange chromatography, and quantified as percentage of total LDL. Six LDL subfractions were isolated by density gradient ultracentrifugation and phenotype A or B classified as the quotient (LDL1-LDL3)/(LDL4-LDL6). Compared to the control group, IDDM subjects with poor glycaemic control showed higher electronegative LDL (19.03 ± 10.09 vs 9.59 ± 2.98 %, p < 0.001), similar LDL subfraction phenotype and lower susceptibility to oxidation (lag phase 45.6 ± 8.8 vs 41.2 ± 4.7 min, p < 0.05). After three months of intensive insulin therapy, HbA 1 c decreased from 10.88 ± 2.43 to 5.69 ± 1.54 % (p < 0.001), and electronegative LDL to 13.84 ± 5.15 % (p < 0.05). No changes in LDL susceptibility to oxidation or LDL subfraction phenotype were observed. Electronegative LDL appeared significantly correlated to HbA 1 c and fructosamine (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001) only in poorly controlled IDDM patients. These findings suggest that high electronegative LDL in IDDM subjects is related to the degree of glycaemic control, and could therefore be due to LDL glycation rather than to LDL oxidation or changes in LDL subfraction phenotype.

Small dense LDL particles (B phenotype) are considered to be more atherogenic than large buoyant LDL particles. The influence of glycemic control on LDL particle size and density is still under debate. The aim of this study was to determine LDL subfraction phenotype in both IDDM and NIDDM patients in poor glycemic control compared with that of respective matched control groups. In addition, we evaluated the effect of a 3-month period of optimized glycemic control on this parameter. Thirty-seven IDDM patients and 33 NIDDM patients, together with two respective age-, sex-, and BMI-matched control groups were studied. Non-A phenotype prevalence in IDDM patients before (19%) and after blood glucose optimization (11%) was similar to that of their control group (12%). However, NIDDM patients displayed a higher proportion of the non-A phenotype (51%) than did the control group (28%), but it became closer (30%, P < 0.05) after glycemic control improved. All subjects with non-A phenotype that changed to A phenotype showed triglyceride levels below 1.63 mmol/l and a greater decrease in HbA1c than did subjects whose phenotype did not change (4.9 +/- 1.5 vs. 3.1 +/- 1.4%, P < 0.05). A higher proportion of small dense LDL was observed in NIDDM women than in nondiabetic women (LDL5 10.0 +/- 4.8 vs. 6.3 +/- 1.5%, LDL6 6.1 +/- 2.2 vs. 4.2 +/- 0.8%, P < 0.05) during both stages of glycemic control, but no differences were observed between NIDDM and nondiabetic men. In conclusion, these findings provide new evidence for the relevance of near-normal glycemic control in the prevention of macrovascular disease and could contribute to an explanation of the loss of protection for cardiovascular disease in diabetic women.

No abstract

No abstract