Objective: To investigate the effect of a probiotic milk product containing the culture CAUSIDO 1 and of two alternative products on risk factors for cardiovascular disease in overweight and obese subjects. Design: An 8 week randomized, double-blind, placebo-and compliance-controlled, parallel study. Subjects: Seventy healthy, weight-stable, overweight and obese (25.0`BMI`37.5 kgam 2 ) males (n 20) and females (n 50), 18 ± 55 y old, were randomly assigned into ®ve groups. Intervention: Four groups consumed 450 ml fermented milk products (yoghurt) daily. Group 1: a yoghurt fermented with two strains of Streptococcus thermophilus and two strains of Lactobacillus acidophilus (StLa). Group 2: a placebo yoghurt fermented with delta-acid-lactone (PY). Group 3: a yoghurt fermented with two strains of Streptococcus thermophilus and one strain of Lactobacillus rhamnosus (StLr). Group 4: a yoghurt fermented with one strain of Enterococcus faecium and two strains of Streptococcus thermophilus (CAUSIDO 1 culture), GAIO 1 (G). The dietary composition of the yoghurt was otherwise similar. The ®fth group was given two placebo pills (PP) daily. Results: When comparing all ®ve treatment groups, unadjusted for changes in body weight, no statistical effects were observed in week 8 in the G-group on low density lipoproteins (LDL)-cholesterol (P 0.29). After adjustment for small changes in body weight, LDL-cholesterol decreased by 8.4% (0.26 AE 0.10 mmolal; P`0.05) and ®brinogen increased (0.74AE 0.32 mmolal; P`0.05) after 8 weeks in the G-group. This was signi®cantly different from the group consuming chemically fermented yoghurt and the group consuming placebo pills (P`0.05). After 8 weeks, systolic blood pressure was signi®cantly more reduced in the StLa and Ggroup compared to StLr. No other differences were found. Conclusion: The CAUSIDO 1 culture reduced LDL-cholesterol and increased ®brinogen in the overweight subjects at a 450 ml consumption daily for 8 weeks. The effect on LDL-cholesterol con®rms previous studies. An immunostimulation by one of the strains in the product might explain the effect on ®brinogen in the G-group.
OBJECTIVE -To assess the safety and efficacy of insulin aspart (IAsp) versus regular human insulin (HI) in basal-bolus therapy with NPH insulin in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS -Subjects (n ϭ 322) who were pregnant or planning pregnancy were randomized to IAsp or HI as meal-time insulin in an open-label, parallel-group, multicenter study. Subjects had A1C Յ8% at confirmation of pregnancy. Insulin doses were titrated toward predefined glucose targets and A1C Ͻ6.5%. Outcomes assessed included risk of major maternal hypoglycemia, A1C, plasma glucose profiles, and maternal safety outcomes. A total of 80% of subjects achieved an A1C Յ6.5%. At the end of first and third trimesters, average postprandial plasma glucose increments were significantly lower with IAsp than HI (P ϭ 0.003 and P ϭ 0.044, respectively), as were mean plasma glucose levels 90 min after breakfast (P ϭ 0.044 and P ϭ 0.001, respectively). Maternal safety profiles and pregnancy outcomes were similar between treatments. RESULTSCONCLUSIONS -IAsp is at least as safe and effective as HI when used in basal-bolus therapy with NPH insulin in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes and may potentially offer some benefits in terms of postprandial glucose control and preventing severe hypoglycemia. Diabetes Care 30:771-776, 2007
Whole-grain consumption does not decrease body weight compared with control consumption, but a small beneficial effect on body fat may be present. The relatively short duration of intervention studies (≤16 wk) may explain the lack of difference in body weight and fat. Discrepancies between studies may be caused by differences in study design.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of a high-sucrose diet vs a high-starch and a high-fat diet on 14 d ad libitum energy intake, body weight, energy expenditure and sympathoadrenal activity. MEASURMENTS: Food intake; body weight and composition (bioelectrical impedance); 24 h energy expenditure, substrate oxidation rates, spontaneous physical activity, heart rate and appetite sensations in a respiration chamber (VAS scores); plasma catecholamine concentration and blood pressure. SUBJECTS: Twenty normal-weight, healthy women, 9 post-obese (body mass index (BMI): 22.9 AE 0.7 kg/m 2 ) and 11 closely matched controls (BMI: 22.6 AE 0.4 kg/m 2 ). RESULTS: Average 14 d ad libitum energy intake was 13% and 12% lower on the starch diet compared with the sucrose and fat diets, respectively (P`0.05). In both post-obese and normal-weight subjects, body weight and fat mass decreased signi®cantly on the starch diet (by 0.7 AE 0.2 kg and 0.4 AE 0.1 kg, respectively, P`0.05). No changes were observed on the fat or sucrose diets. After 14 d on the sucrose diet, 24 h energy expenditure as well as postprandial plasma adrenaline and noradrenaline concentrations, were signi®cantly increased compared with the other two diets. Overall satiety and palatability ratings were also highest on the sucrose diet. CONCLUSION: Intake of a 14-d ad libitum high-starch diet decreased energy intake and body weight compared with a high-fat or high-sucrose diet. The increased energy expenditure observed on the sucrose-rich diet can probably be explained both by the increased intake of energy and fructose (mainly from sucrose) on this diet.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.