Background and aims:The clinical course of inflammatory bowel disease is characterised by a succession of relapses and remissions. The aim of our study was to assess whether the predictive value of faecal calprotectin-a non-invasive marker of intestinal inflammation-for clinical relapse is different in ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). Methods: Seventy nine consecutive patients with a diagnosis of clinically quiescent inflammatory bowel disease (38 CD and 41 UC) were followed for 12 months, undergoing regular clinical evaluations and blood tests. A single stool sample was collected at the beginning of the study from each patient and the calprotectin concentration was assessed by a commercially available enzyme linked immunoassay. Results: In CD, median calprotectin values were 220.1 mg/g (95% confidence interval (CI) 21.7-418.5) in those patients who relapsed during follow up, and 220.5 mg/g (95% CI 53-388) in non-relapsing patients (p = 0.395). In UC, median calprotectin values were 220.6 mg/g (95% CI 86-355.2) and 67 mg/g (95% CI 15-119) in relapsing and non-relapsing patients, respectively (p,0.0001). The multivariate Cox (proportional hazard) regression model, after adjustment for possible confounding variables, showed a twofold and 14-fold increase in the relapse risk, respectively, in those patients with CD and UC in clinical remission who had a faecal calprotectin concentration higher than 150 mg/g. Conclusions: Faecal calprotectin proved to be an even stronger predictor of clinical relapse in UC than in CD, which makes the test a promising non-invasive tool for monitoring and optimising therapy.

The influence of steatosis and of other donor and recipient characteristics in affecting liver performance post-orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) was evaluated in 311 consecutive liver transplantations made in 278 patients. Donor variables considered were age, sex, blood group, cause of death, intensive care unit (ICU) days, need for vasopressors, hepatic enzymes and bilirubin, total and warm ischemia time, and macro- and microvescicular steatosis. Recipient variables considered were age, sex, blood group, biliary output, and post-OLT peak levels of hepatic enzymes. Patient and graft survival were the main outcome indicators. In the multivariate analysis, macrovescicular steatosis involving 25% or more of the hepatocytes was the only variable independently associated with shorter patient survival (p < 0.05). Five (62.5%) of the eight livers with macrovescicular steatosis involving 25% or more of the hepatocytes incurred in a delayed non-function (DNF) and one (12.5%) in a primary non-function (PRNF). The incidence of DNF and PRNF in the group with macrovescicular steatosis involving less than 25% of the liver cells was 1.6% (p < 0.001) and 2.3%, respectively. Microvescicular steatosis of any degree was not associated with a worse prognosis. Macrovescicular steatosis involving 25% or more of the hepatocytes identifies marginal livers, the use of which significantly increases the risk of graft non-function post-OLT.

Background/AimsEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the standard approach for the management of biliary complications in liver transplant patients; however, its safety and efficacy have not been established in this setting. This study was performed to evaluate the safety and long-term efficacy of ERCP in transplant patients.MethodsThe case reports of 1,500 liver transplant patients were reviewed. Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) patients were matched 1:2 with non-OLT patients and followed-up for long-term outcome (median, 7.4 years).ResultsOf the 1,500 liver transplant patients, 94 (6.3%) underwent 150 ERCPs after OLT. Anastomotic strictures were present in 45 patients, biliary stones in 24, biliary leaks in 7, papillary stenosis in 2, and primary sclerosing cholangitis in 1. An ERCP success rate of 90.7% was achieved; biliary stenting led to resolution of the bile leak in 7/7 (100%) patients, and biliary stones were removed in 21/24 (87.5%) patients. In addition, 34 of 45 patients with anastomotic stricture underwent endoscopic dilation. We obtained complete resolution in 22/34 (64.7%) patients. OLT patients did not show a higher probability of complications (odds ratio [OR], 1.04), of pancreatitis (OR, 0.80) or of bleeding (OR, 1.34).ConclusionsERCP is safe and effective for the treatment of post-OLT biliary complications, has a low rate of pancreatitis and results in a durable effect.

Biliary leaks complicating hepaticojejunostomy (HJA) or fistulas from cut surface are severe complications after liver transplantation (LT) and split-liver transplantation (SLT). The aim of the study was to describe our experience about the safety and efficacy of radiological percutaneous treatment without dilatation of intrahepatic biliary ducts. From 1990 to 2006, 1595 LTs in 1463 patients were performed in our center. In 1199 LTs (75.2%), a duct-to-duct anastomosis was performed, and in 396 (24.8%), an HJA was performed. One hundred twenty-nine anastomotic or cut-surface bile leakages occurred in 115 patients. Sixty-two biliary leaks occurred in 54 patients with HJA; in 48 cases, an anastomotic fistula was found. Cut-surface fistulas occurred in 14 cases: 5 in right SLTs and 5 in left SLTs. Twenty-two patients were treated with 23 percutaneous approaches for 17 HJA fistulas and 6 cut-surface leaks without intrahepatic bile duct dilatation. Two percutaneous therapeutic approaches were used: percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) for fistula alone and PTBD with percutaneous drainage of biliary collection in patients with both complications. PTBD was successful in 21 cases (91.3%); the median delay from catheter insertion and leak resolution was 10.3 days (range: 7-41). The median maintenance of drainage was 14.8 days. In 1 patient, fistula recurrence after PTBD needed a surgical approach; after that, an anastomotic fistula was still found, and a new PTBD was successfully performed. In another patient, PTBD was immediately followed by retransplantation for portal vein thrombosis. There were no complications related to the interventional procedure. In conclusion, biliary fistulas after HJA in LT or after SLT can be successfully treated by PTBD. The absence of enlarged intrahepatic biliary ducts should not be a contraindication for percutaneous treatment. Liver Transpl 14:611-615, 2008. © 2008 AASLD. Received June 26, 2007 accepted October 31, 2007. Biliary complications after liver transplantation (LT) have an incidence of 10% to 30% 1 ; reduced-size LT, split-liver transplantation (SLT), and living-donor LT are associated with increased rates of biliary complications.2 A lower rate of complications directly related to hepaticojejunostomy (HJA) versus duct-to-duct anastomosis has been described.3-5 Surgical repair and endoscopic management have been reported to successfully treat post-LT biliary fistulas from duct-to-duct anastomosis, but when the biliary leaks complicate HJA or they rise from the cut surface of the liver, an endoscopic approach is not possible. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous treatment of post-LT biliary leakages occurring in HJA or in split-liver recipients in the absence of biliary tree dilatation. PATIENTS AND METHODSFrom 1990 to 2006, 1595 LTs in 1463 patients were performed in our center; in 1199 LTs (75%), a duct-toAbbreviations: HLA, hepaticojejunostomy; LT, liver transplantation; PTBD, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainag...

No abstract