A convenience sample of male nonathlete college students (n = 47) was assessed (diet intake, physical activity, and anthropometrics) and interviewed on protein knowledge/behavior. Most participants were unaware or misinformed about protein and were using supplements. Fifteen percent of participants consumed less than 0.8 g/kg per day, 70% consumed 0.8 to 1.99 g/kg per day, and 15% consumed 2 g/kg per day or more of protein. Differences between protein intake groups were assessed using a multivariate analysis of variance. The low protein intake group had higher body fat percentages, body mass indexes, and waist circumferences (P < .05). Future experimental research is needed to examine the impact of differing protein intakes on body composition in college male populations.
To determine protein knowledge, dietary practices, and intakes compared to recommendations, a convenience sample of non‐athlete college males (n=50), 18‐24 years old, completed 7 day dietary and physical activity records; accelerometer assessments; anthropometric assessments; knowledge and demographic surveys; and interviews. Eighteen percent of males had protein intakes below the AMDR and 0% were above the AMDR. Fourteen percent consumed less than 0.8 gm/kg and 16% consumed over 2 gm/kg. Twenty percent sought protein information from the Internet (primarily from bodybuilding.com), 20% from word of mouth, and 10% from classes. Twenty‐four percent thought they should be consuming one gram per pound of bodyweight. When asked how many grams of protein they thought they needed a day, based on grams they reported and measured body weight, 29% estimated their protein needs within a range of 0.8‐2.0 gm/kg, 22% estimated over 2 gm/kg, 29% estimated under 0.8 gm/kg, and 20% did not know how much they needed. Based on these findings, many non‐athlete college males are misinformed on protein needs, seek information from potentially unreliable sources, and may not be consuming optimal amounts of protein.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.