No abstract

List of interviews to inform the study on national-level climate finance mechanisms 3 Analytical framework 4 Gender and pro-poor analysis of national-level climate finance mechanisms 5 Influence matrix 6 Artesian well design of the Geology Agency, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (KESDM) 7 Key informant interview questionnaire: Climate change mitigation 8 Focus group discussion (FGD) questionnaire: Climate change mitigation 9 Key informant interview questionnaire: Climate change adaptation 10 Focus group discussion (FGD) questionnaire: Climate change adaptation 11 Gender Transformative Change in the climate change mitigation program 12 Gender Transformative Change in the climate change adaptation program 13 Gender Analysis Pathway: Access, benefit, control and participation in the climate change mitigation program 14 Gender Analysis Pathway: Access, benefit, control and participation in the climate change adaptation program Contents This study is developed under the UNDP Sustainable Development Financing (SDF) project supported by UNDP Strengthening the Governance of Climate Change Finance (GCCF) and UNDP-UNEP Poverty Environment Action (PEA) programmes, and co-financed by CGIAR's Forest Trees and Agroforestry (FTA).

Insights from national climate finance mechanisms in Indonesia Key messages• Climate finance mechanisms (CFMs) can either help or hinder women and the poor from adapting to and mitigating climate change.• CFMs in Indonesia are attentive to poverty alleviation, but gender equality has not received commensurate attention. Systems for monitoring, evaluating and learning from gender and poverty outcomes are weak or nonexistent. Few feedback mechanisms channels.• Indonesia's national level policies support gender equality, but people implementing them in CFMs do not have a common understanding of what it is and why it matters.• Performance-based budgeting (PBB) can help advance gender equality and poverty reduction if government ministries and agencies agree on the importance of gender equality, acknowledge the vital role of women and the poor, and learn from experiences.• We recommend improvements in the way CFMs are conceptualized and designed, and funds are allocated and used. Monitoring, evaluation and learning systems need to focus on impact, give voice for women and the poor, and enable improvements with time.