Objective: Diet interventions may reduce the risk of urinary stone formation and its recurrence, but there is no conclusive consensus in the literature regarding the effectiveness of dietary interventions and recommendations about specific diets for patients with urinary calculi. The aim of this study was to review the studies reporting the effects of different dietary interventions for the modification of urinary risk factors in patients with urinary stone disease. Materials and Methods: A systematic search of the Pubmed database literature up to July 1, 2014 for studies on dietary treatment of urinary risk factors for urinary stone formation was conducted according to a methodology developed a priori. Studies were screened by titles and abstracts for eligibility. Data were extracted using a standardized form and the quality of evidence was assessed. Results: Evidence from the selected studies were used to form evidencebased guideline statements. In the absence of sufficient evidence, additional statements were developed as expert opinions. Conclusions: General measures: Each patient with nephrolithiasis should undertake appropriate evaluation according to the knowledge of the calculus composition. Regardless of the underlying cause of the stone disease, a mainstay of conservative management is the forced increase in fluid intake to achieve a daily urine output of 2 liters. Hypercalciuria: Dietary calcium restriction is not recommended for stone formers with nephrolithiasis. Diets with a calcium content ≥ 1 g/day (and low protein-low sodium) could be protective against the risk of stone formation in hypercalciuric stone forming adults. Moderate dietary salt restriction is useful in limiting urinary calcium excretion and thus may be helpful for primary and secondary prevention of nephrolithiasis. A low-normal protein intake decrease calciuria and could be useful in stone prevention and preservation of bone mass. Omega-3 fatty acids and bran of different origin decreases calciuria, but their impact on the urinary stone risk profile is uncertain. Sports beverage do not affect the urinary stone risk profile. Hyperoxaluria: A diet low in oxalate and/or a calcium intake normal to high (800-1200 mg/day for adults) reduce the urinary excretion of oxalate, conversely a diet rich in oxalates and/or a diet low in calcium increase urinary oxalate. A restriction in protein intake may reduce the urinary excretion of oxalate although a vegetarian diet may lead to an increase in urinary oxalate. Adding bran to a diet low in oxalate cancels its effect of reducing urinary oxalate. Conversely, the addition of supplements of fruit and vegetables to a mixed diet does not involve an increased excretion of oxalate in the urine. The intake of pyridoxine reduces the excretion of oxalate. Hyperuricosuria: In patients with renal calcium stones SummaryNo conflict of interest declared. DOI: 10.4081/aiua.2015.2.105the decrease of the urinary excretion of uric acid after restriction of dietary protein and purine is suggested although not cle...

Obesity related nephrolithiasis seems to necessitate weight loss as primary treatment, but the recognition of the associated complications is necessary to prevent induction of new and equally severe medical problems. The optimal approach to obesity control that minimizes stone risk needs to be determined in order to manage obesity-induced renal stones disease.

BackgroundRadiotherapy is an increasingly preferred treatment option for localized prostate cancer, and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) a relatively established modality of therapeutic irradiation. The present study analyzes the toxicity and biochemical efficacy of SBRT in 100 consecutive prostate cancer patients treated with CyberKnife Robotic Radiosurgery System.MethodsOne hundred patients were treated with SBRT at the Radiation Oncology department of San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy. All patients included in this IRB-approved protocol-driven prospective study had biopsy-proven prostate cancer. Risk category was low in 41, intermediate in 42, and high in 17 patients. The patients were treated with CyberKnife-SBRT (CK-SBRT), the prescription dose was 35 Gy in five fractions, corresponding to 92 Gy in 2-Gy fractions (α/β =1.5 Gy); 29 patients also received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).ResultsMedian follow-up was 36 months (range, 6–76 months). Acute Grade 2 genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity occurred in respectively 12% and 18% of the patients; there were no Grade 3 or higher acute toxicities. Late Grade 1, 2, and 3 genitourinary toxicities occurred in 4%, 3%, and 1% of the patients, respectively; late Grade 1 gastrointestinal toxicity occurred in two patients and Grade 2 toxicity in one patient; no late gastrointestinal toxicities of grade 3 or 4 were observed. Median PSA nadir was 0.45 ng/ml at 36 months for all patients. In the SBRT-monotherapy group, the median PSA nadir at 36 months was 0.62 ng/ml; in the ADT-SBRT group, it was 0.18 ng/ml. Four patients had clinical recurrence: one local, two lymph nodes, and one to the bone. Ninety-six patients had no evidence of biochemical or clinical recurrence. A benign PSA bounce of median 1.08 ng/ml occurred in 12% of the 71 SBRT monotherapy patients at a mean 23 months (range, 18–30 months).ConclusionsIn this study CK-SBRT has provided promising outcomes in localized prostate cancer with good PSA response, minimal toxicity and patient inconvenience.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a new treatment modality for prostate cancer. The current study evaluates CyberKnife SBRT and reports toxicity and early Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) kinetics. From June 2006 to August 2009, 45 low-and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients received Cyberknife SBRT of 35 Gy in five fractions with 95% minimum target coverage. Median follow-up was 20-months (range 6-42-months). Seventeen patients received androgen-deprivation therapy also. Acute complications were mild, short-lived and no greater than Grade 2 by RTOG scale. Late toxicities consisted of one patient (2.2%) experiencing Grade 2 rectal, one patient (2.2%) Grade 3 and four patients (8.8%) with Grade 1 urinary toxicity. PSA in all patients progressively declined from a mean 4.7 ng/ml baseline to 1.48 ng/ml at three months, to 0.68 ng/ml at 12 months and to 0, 35 ng/ml at 24 months. The 28 hormon-naive patients had the mean PSA value of 1.1 ng/ml at one year from a mean 6.65 ng/ml baseline. There was a significant PSA value reduction in 11 hormone therapy patients with low baseline PSA value (< or = 1 ng/ml) from 0.37 down 0.14 ng/ml (p value 0.0068) at one year. Moreover, 14 low risk patients gave better results of mean PSA value than 17 Intermediate risk patients 0.43 ng/ml vs. 0.93 ng/ml (p value 0.02) at one year. No patient had biochemical failure at last follow-up. Hypofractionated SBRT appears to have potential against prostate cancer. Low toxicity and encouraging biochemical control support its use in early-stage prostate cancer. Results encourage further follow-up and larger studies.

Objective Rheumatology is among the least compensated specialties in medicine today. This is a significant problem for clinical rheumatologists in academic medicine who are often expected to earn their salaries through clinical practice alone. Additionally, academic rheumatologists usually cannot generate revenue through office laboratory monitoring, radiographs, or bone densitometry to supplement their income (i.e., downstream income). The purpose of our study was to examine revenue generated from downstream income to a university by a clinical‐academic rheumatologist. Methods Consecutive outpatients (n = 127) seen predominately by one academic rheumatologist over one month of clinic were followed for 18 months. The total physician compensation for patient visits was calculated and compared with the revenue generated from laboratory tests, radiologic studies, consultations, and specific rheumatologic treatments and procedures performed or ordered. Medicare reimbursement rates for 2003 were used as compensation standards for all charges. Results Physician office visit billing generated $36,297 from 730 office visits. The total amount of downstream income from these office visits was $363,813 ($47,386 from laboratory tests, $35,582 from radiologic studies, $8,159 from rheumatologic procedures, $261,584 from rheumatologic infusions, and $11,101 from initial consultations). Therefore, $10.02 of downstream revenue was generated for every $1.00 of office visit compensation applied to the academic rheumatologist's salary. Conclusion Although academic rheumatologists struggle to bill their salaries through seeing more patients, they are clearly a bargain for a university hospital because they generate >$10.00 for every $1.00 they receive for an office visit.