No abstract

No abstract

Ten patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF), (4 pneumonia, 4 sepsis, 2 polytrauma), underwent computerized tomography (CT) of the lungs, (apex, hilum, base), at 5, 10, 15 cm H2O positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP). The ARF lungs, on CT scan, appeared as a patchwork of normal and dense areas with generally well defined boundaries. Most of the densities were found in the dependent regions. The areas of density were correlated with PaO2 (r = 0.51). The PEEP increase resulted in a significant expansion of total cross-sectional lung surface area. The dense areas decreased significantly at the hilum and base when increasing PEEP while the changes at the apex were not significant. The changes of density with PEEP were highly correlated with the changes in oxygenation (r = 0.91). In the individual patient, however, the modifications of gas exchange can not be entirely predicted from morphological changes, possibly due to a diversion of pulmonary blood flow.

Italy) (4) Interdisciplinary Centre for Nanostructured Materials and Interfaces (CIMaINa), Milano (Italy) (5) Fondazione IRCCS "Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori", Milano (Italy)

The aim of the guideline presented in this article is to unify the test parameters for image quality evaluation and radiation output in all types of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) systems. The applications of CBCT spread over dental and interventional radiology, guided surgery and radiotherapy. The chosen tests provide the means to objectively evaluate the performance and monitor the constancy of the imaging chain. Experience from all involved associations has been collected to achieve a consensus that is rigorous and helpful for the practice. The guideline recommends to assess image quality in terms of uniformity, geometrical precision, voxel density values (or Hounsfield units where available), noise, low contrast resolution and spatial resolution measurements. These tests usually require the use of a phantom and evaluation software. Radiation output can be determined with a kerma-area product meter attached to the tube case. Alternatively, a solid state dosimeter attached to the flat panel and a simple geometric relationship can be used to calculate the dose to the isocentre. Summary tables including action levels and recommended frequencies for each test, as well as relevant references, are provided. If the radiation output or image quality deviates from expected values, or exceeds documented action levels for a given system, a more in depth system analysis (using conventional tests) and corrective maintenance work may be required.