Background Zebrafish have practical features that make them a useful model for higher-throughput tests of gene function using CRISPR/Cas9 editing to create ‘knockout’ models. In particular, the use of G0 mosaic mutants has potential to increase throughput of functional studies significantly but may suffer from transient effects of introducing Cas9 via microinjection. Further, a large number of computational and empirical tools exist to design CRISPR assays but often produce varied predictions across methods leaving uncertainty in choosing an optimal approach for zebrafish studies. Methods To systematically assess accuracy of tool predictions of on- and off-target gene editing, we subjected zebrafish embryos to CRISPR/Cas9 with 50 different guide RNAs (gRNAs) targeting 14 genes. We also investigate potential confounders of G0-based CRISPR screens by assaying control embryos for spurious mutations and altered gene expression. Results We compared our experimental in vivo editing efficiencies in mosaic G0 embryos with those predicted by eight commonly used gRNA design tools and found large discrepancies between methods. Assessing off-target mutations (predicted in silico and in vitro) found that the majority of tested loci had low in vivo frequencies (< 1%). To characterize if commonly used ‘mock’ CRISPR controls (larvae injected with Cas9 enzyme or mRNA with no gRNA) exhibited spurious molecular features that might exacerbate studies of G0 mosaic CRISPR knockout fish, we generated an RNA-seq dataset of various control larvae at 5 days post fertilization. While we found no evidence of spontaneous somatic mutations of injected larvae, we did identify several hundred differentially-expressed genes with high variability between injection types. Network analyses of shared differentially-expressed genes in the ‘mock’ injected larvae implicated a number of key regulators of common metabolic pathways, and gene-ontology analysis revealed connections with response to wounding and cytoskeleton organization, highlighting a potentially lasting effect from the microinjection process that requires further investigation. Conclusion Overall, our results provide a valuable resource for the zebrafish community for the design and execution of CRISPR/Cas9 experiments.

Zebrafish have practical features that make them a useful model for higher-throughput tests of gene function using CRISPR/Cas9 editing to create ‘knockout’ models. Due to the large number of available tools to design CRISPR assays and diversity of theories/model systems they were originally built on, we sought to systematically compare computational and empirical approaches for predicting gene-editing efficacy in zebrafish. We subjected zebrafish embryos to CRISPR/Cas9 with 50 different guide RNAs (gRNAs) targeting 14 genes and assayed individual editing efficiencies. We compared our experimental in vivo efficiencies in mosaic G0 embryos with those predicted by seven commonly used gRNA design tools and found large discrepancies between methods. Assessing off-target mutations (predicted in silico and in vitro) found that the majority of tested loci had low in vivo frequencies (<1%). Moreover, understanding that recent segmental duplications in the zebrafish genome could exacerbate CRISPR targeting of individual genes, we cataloged these loci and have made them available as a resource. Lastly, we assessed the transcriptome of negative ‘mock’ control CRISPR larvae injected with Cas9 enzyme or mRNA with no gRNA using RNA-seq and identified differentially expressed genes with high variability between injections. Using these same data, we discovered on average ~60 putative somatic mosaic frameshift mutations impacting genes per pool of injected larvae, potentially due to background cutting of DNA with Cas9 in the absence of gRNA. To verify this previously unreported phenomenon in zebrafish, we validated seven of twelve genes tested carrying low frequency mosaic somatic mutations in the genomes of a separate batch of injected larvae. These results suggest that negative control embryos may carry mutations within genes leading to spurious phenotypes. Overall, our results provide a valuable resource for the zebrafish community for the design and execution of CRISPR/Cas9 experiments.