Multiple mission reusable launch vehicles could be an interesting and attractive option of the future with cost saving potential. A similar RLV-configuration capable of fulfilling very different needs might significantly reduce the development effort compared to individual developments of several dedicated crafts. The announcement of Elon Musk on the imminent development of a fully reusable two-stage launcher to LEO of very large size, called "BFR" is one spectacular example. DLR's SpaceLiner concept is similar in certain aspects to the idea of multiple mission reusable launch vehicles. While in its primary role conceived as an ultrafast intercontinental passenger transport, in its second role the SpaceLiner is intended as an RLV capable of delivering heavy payloads into orbit. The paper provides multidisciplinary technical analyses of the different proposed multi-mission RLV-concepts. The characteristic flight conditions of winged gliding stages with those of rocket-decelerated vertical landing vehicles are compared. Performance, size and safety aspects are evaluated.

Any effort which intends to physically interact with specific asteroids requires understanding at least of the composition and multi-scale structure of the surface layers, sometimes also of the interior. Therefore, it is necessary first to characterize each target object sufficiently by a precursor mission to design the mission which then interacts with the object. In small solar system body (SSSB) science missions, this trend towards landing and sample-return missions is most apparent. It also has led to much interest in MASCOT-like landing modules and instrument carriers. They integrate at the instrument level to their mothership and by their size are compatible even with small interplanetary missions.The DLR-ESTEC GOSSAMER Roadmap NEA Science Working Groups' studies identified Multiple NEA Rendezvous (MNR) as one of the space science missions only feasible with solar sail propulsion. Parallel studies of Solar Polar Orbiter (SPO) and Displaced L1 (DL1) space weather early warning missions studies outlined very lightweight sailcraft and the use of separable payload modules for operations close to Earth as well as the ability to access any inclination and a wide range of heliocentric distances. These and many other studies outline the unique capability of solar sails to provide access to all SSSB, at least within the orbit of Jupiter. Since the original MNR study, significant progress has been made to explore the performance envelope of nearterm solar sails for multiple NEA rendezvous.However, although it is comparatively easy for solar sails to reach and rendezvous with objects in any inclination and in the complete range of semi-major axis and eccentricity relevant to NEOs and PHOs, it remains notoriously difficult for sailcraft to interact physically with a SSSB target object as e.g. the HAYABUSA missions do.The German Aerospace Center, DLR, recently brought the GOSSAMER solar sail deployment technology to qualification status in the GOSSAMER-1 project. Development of closely related technologies is continued for very large deployable membrane-based photovoltaic arrays in the GOSOLAR project.We expand the philosophy of the GOSSAMER solar sail concept of efficient multiple sub-spacecraft integration to also include landers for one-way in-situ investigations and sample-return missions. These are equally useful for planetary defence scenarios, SSSB science and NEO utilization. We outline the technological concept used to complete such missions and the synergetic integration and operation of sail and lander. We similarly extend the philosophy of MASCOT and use its characteristic features as well as the concept of Constraints-Driven Engineering for a wider range of operations.

In this paper we present a series of results related to mathematical models of self-assembling systems of tiles and the impacts that three diverse properties have on their dynamics. In these self-assembling systems, initially unorganized collections of tiles undergo random motion and can bind together, if they collide and enough of their incident glues match, to form assemblies. Here we greatly expand upon a series of prior results which showed that (1) the abstract Tile Assembly Model (aTAM) is intrinsically universal (FOCS 2012), and (2) the class of directed aTAM systems is not intrinsically universal (FOCS 2016). Intrinsic universality (IU) for a model (or class of systems within a model) means that there is a universal tile set which can be used to simulate an arbitrary system within that model (or class). Furthermore, the simulation must not only produce the same resultant structures, it must also maintain the full dynamics of the systems being simulated and display the same behaviors modulo a scale factor. While the FOCS 2012 result showed that the standard, two-dimensional (2D) aTAM is IU, here we show that this is also the case for the three-dimensional (3D) version. Conversely, the FOCS 2016 result showed that the class of aTAM systems which are directed (a.k.a. deterministic, or confluent) is not IU, meaning that there is no universal simulator which can simulate directed aTAM systems while itself always remaining directed, implying that nondeterminism is fundamentally required for such simulations. Here, however, we show that in 3D the class of directed aTAM systems is actually IU, i.e. there is a universal directed simulator for them. This implies that the constraint of tiles binding only in the plane forced the necessity of nondeterminism for the simulation of 2D directed systems. This then leads us to continue to explore the impacts of dimensionality and directedness on simulation of tile-based self-assembling systems by considering the influence of more rigid notions of dimensionality. Namely, we introduce the Planar aTAM, where tiles are not only restricted to binding in the plane, but they are also restricted to traveling within the plane, and we prove that the Planar aTAM is not IU, and prove that the class of directed systems within the Planar aTAM also is not IU. Finally, analogous to the Planar aTAM, we introduce the Spatial aTAM, its 3D counterpart, and prove that the Spatial aTAM is IU.This paper adds to a broad set of results which have been used to classify and compare the relative powers of differing models and classes of self-assembling systems, and also helps to further the understanding of the roles of dimension and nondeterminism on the dynamics of self-assembling systems. Furthermore, to prove our positive results we have not only designed, but also implemented what we believe to be the first IU tile set ever implemented and simulated in any tile assembly model, and have made it, along with a simulator which can demonstrate it, freely available.1 Our implementation omits two relati...

No abstract

No abstract