Alternating electrical fields can disrupt mitosis leading to apoptosis of rapidly dividing cancer cells. The device that utilizes this mechanism is known as tumor-treating fields (TTFields). TTFields can be applied by ceramic transducer arrays on a shaved scalp to deliver the alternating electric activity to patients with glioblastoma (GBM). It has FDA approval for use in both recurrent and newly diagnosed GBM. The objective is to critically appraise the current evidence for the use of TTFields as adjunctive treatment to newly diagnosed GBM. The objective was addressed through the development of a structured, critically appraised topic. We incorporated a clinical scenario, background information, a structured question, literature search strategy, evidence summary, clinical bottom lines, and expert discussion. Participants included consultant and resident neurologists, a medical librarian, clinical epidemiologists, and content experts in the field of neurooncology. A randomized controlled trial was selected for critical appraisal. Patients with newly diagnosed GBM completing standard radiation and chemotherapy with temozolomide (TMZ) were subsequently randomized to receive maintenance TMZ with TTFields, or TMZ alone. With the addition of TTFields, median progression-free survival was 6.7 months compared with 4 months without the addition of TTFields (95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.76; P<0.001) and overall survival was 20.9 months compared with 16.0 months without the addition of TTFields (95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.76; P<0.001). TTFields may increase both progression-free and overall survival in patients receiving standard chemoradiation therapy for GBM.

Purpose: The cardinal symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) include pain in the affected hand(s). The median/second lumbrical nerve (Med2ndL) seems relatively preserved in severe CTS, with previous small studies suggesting its value in electromyogram to localize a median neuropathy to the wrist when both initial routine sensory and thenar motor responses are absent. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of 208 hands in 183 patients with electrophysiologically markedly severe CTS (absent routine sensory and thenar motor median responses) who underwent stimulation of both the Med2ndL and ulnar/second dorsal interosseous (Uln2ndDIn) motor nerves. A Med2ndL distal latency of ≥ 0.5 milliseconds when compared with the Uln2ndDIn supported the diagnosis of CTS. The presence or absence of hand pain was recorded if these data were available. Results: Some 83.7% of hands (172/208) in 183 patients with markedly severe CTS had preservation of the Med2ndL meeting criteria for CTS. In those with pain data available, 77.1% (81/105) of hands had no pain. Of those 105 hands, 87 had preservation of the Med2ndL with 79.3% (69/87) demonstrating no pain. Conclusions: This is a large study that demonstrates the relative preservation of the Med2ndL response in markedly severe CTS. Assessment of the Med2ndL should be considered to electrophysiologically support CTS when routine sensory and thenar motor responses are absent. In addition, most patients with electrophysiologically markedly severe CTS had no pain.