Background Approximately 2–10% of patients with varicocele complain of pain. Varicocelectomy for testicular pain is a surgical choice when conservative therapy fails to relieve the pain. Different variables have been reported as prognostic factors for pain relief following varicocele ligation. Moreover, the success rate of varicocelectomy for testicular pain has varied among studies. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the predictors and success rate of microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomy performed for the treatment of painful varicocele. Results Among the 132 patients, 83.3% reported pain relief. A significant association was identified between varicocelectomy for unilateral testicular pain and pain resolution (P < 0.0001); no other factors were predictors of pain relief. Conclusions Microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomy for testicular pain is an effective surgical alternative. Varicocelectomy for unilateral testicular pain may predict postoperative pain relief in appropriately selected patients.
Objective: The objective of the study is to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and long-term outcome of en bloc renal pedicle control during laparoscopic nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy. Patients and Methods: A total of 126 nephrectomies and nephroureterectomies that underwent en bloc renal pedicle control using the endovascular stapler (45 or 60 mm vascular reload) were retrospectively analyzed. Perioperative outcomes, including the risk of arteriovenous fistula (AVF), hospital stay, and estimated blood loss, were recorded. Complications were reported using Clavien classification. Results: En bloc pedicle control was employed in 126 laparoscopic nephrectomies and nephroureterectomies on 126 patients with a mean age of 55.7 years (range: 18–94) and a mean body mass index of 29.2 kg/m2 (range: 17–42). All laparoscopic nephrectomies were performed or supervised by one of three minimally invasive surgeons using identical surgical techniques, even in cases of multiple hilar vessels. During follow-up with a mean 23.3 months (range: 12–48), no patients presented with radiological or clinical signs of AVF (91 patients where followed up with either Doppler ultrasound, computed tomography with contrast, or magnetic resonance imaging for different indications). The mean operative time was 91.8 min (range: 45–215). Intraoperative blood transfusion was required in two cases. Diaphragmatic injury occurred in one case but was repaired laparoscopically. Open conversion occurred in two cases with severe colonic adhesions and injury, with one requiring primary repair, and the other managed with a colostomy. One patient developed fever; two patients developed paralytic ileus. Hospital stay mode was 5 days, ranging from 3 to 10 days. Conclusion: En bloc renal pedicle control during laparoscopic nephrectomies is safe with reasonable operative time, and there were no indications of AVF with this technique over the long term.
Background Pelvic lipomatosis is a proliferative disease characterised by excessive fat growth in retroperitoneal space leading to inadequate bladder drainage and ureteral compression. Cystitis glandularis, cystitis cystica, or cystitis follicularis can be found in majority of patients with the disease.Case Presentation We report a case of a 63-year-old man diagnosed outside our hospital with pelvic lipomatosis after finding of pelvic mass behind the bladder causing severe bilateral hydronephrosis. A bladder–sparing excision of the pelvic lipomatosis mass with bilateral ureteric reimplantation was performed, thereby avoiding the need for urinary diversion.Conclusion For patients suffering from pelvic lipomatosis and bilateral hydronephrosis, relief of obstructions to the urinary tract should be prioritized. This can be achieved through traditional surgery such as a ureteral stent insertion, or more radical surgical options such as a total cystectomy and urinary diversion. There have been recent reports of success found in bladder-sparing techniques using mass extirpation and ureteral reimplantation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.