Introduction: Heart failure (HF) has high morbidity and mortality rates. Spironolactone has shown a 30% reduction in all-cause mortality, reduction in hospitalizations, and sudden death. However, data shows low use of spironolactone in HF patients. We aim to assess spironolactone utilization in HF reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) patients and to identify the factors affecting its prescribing. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study of patients diagnosed with HF from January 2016 to January 2017 conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City-Riyadh. Inclusion criteria: all adult HFrEF <40% who are eligible for spironolactone with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II-IV. Serum creatinine should be <2.5 mg/dL in men or <2.0 mg/dL in women, or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >30 mL/min/1.73m 2 and potassium <5.0 mEq/L. Exclusion criteria: pediatrics, end-stage renal disease, primary aldosteronism, and allergy to spironolactone. Results: We screened around 5000 HF patients, of whom 368 were included. Among 195 patients who were not on spironolactone, 121 patients were eligible to use it; however, they did not receive it. One hundred seventy-three patients were on spironolactone, of whom 30 received the drug although they did not meet the eligibility criteria. The mean age of patients on spironolactone was 61±14 and the mean age of patients not on spironolactone was 66.6±15.6. Two hundred seventy-seven patients in the study population were male. Regarding comorbidities, 265 patients were diabetic. As for laboratory findings, the mean potassium for patients on spironolactone was 4.3 mEq/L; the creatinine and eGFR for patients on spironolactone were 82 umol/L (0.9 mg/dl) and 88 mL/min/1.73m 2 while those not on spironolactone had higher creatinine at 93 umol/L (1 mg/dl) and eGFR 80 mL/min/1.73m 2 . Using multivariate regression, we found many factors affecting spironolactone utilization, including EF before spironolactone, serum creatinine, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), angiotensin-II receptor antagonists (ARBs), furosemide, statin, and stroke. Conclusions: Spironolactone for HFrEF is underutilized. EF before spironolactone, serum creatinine, ACEI, ARBs, furosemide, statin, and stroke significantly affect spironolactone utilization. Further studies are warranted to identify barriers affecting spironolactone utilization in HF patients from prescribers' perspectives.

Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are at increased risk of COVID-19 infection because of their suppressed immunity. The available data show that COVID-19 vaccines are less effective in SOT recipients. We aimed to assess the cellular and humoral immunogenicity with an increasing the number of doses of COVID-19 vaccines in SOT recipients and to identify factors affecting vaccine response in this population. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to identify ongoing and completed studies of humoral and cellular immunity following COVID-19 vaccines in SOT recipients. The search retrieved 278 results with 45 duplicates, and 43 records did not match the inclusion criteria. After title and abstract screening, we retained 189 records, and 135 records were excluded. The reasons for exclusion involved studies with immunocompromised patients (non-transplant recipients), dialysis patients, and individuals who had already recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection. After full-text reading, 55 observational studies and randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included. The proportion of responders appeared higher after the third, fourth, and fifth doses. The risk factors for non-response included older age and the use of mycophenolate mofetil, corticosteroids, and other immunosuppressants. This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates the immunogenicity following different doses of COVID-19 vaccines among SOT patients. Due to the low immunogenicity of vaccines, additional strategies to improve vaccine response may be necessary.

No abstract

Background: Hyperglycemia in hospitalized patients is managed through one of the following approaches: sliding scale insulin (SSI) alone; SSI plus long-acting insulin and basal-bolus insulin (BBI). The optimal insulin treatment regimen is still debated. Objectives: To evaluate the clinical outcomes associated with the use of SSI compared to other regimens. Setting: The general medical wards in King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.Methods: Medical charts for adult patients admitted between October 2014-December 2015 with type 2 diabetes or uncontrolled hyperglycemia with insulin treatment were reviewed. Data from capillary blood glucose were measured daily for the first 5 days of hospitalization and recorded. Demographics and blood glucose levels were compared by group using one-way ANOVA or Chi-square test. The number of hyperglycemic/hypoglycemic episodes was analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: A total of 240 patients were included. The three insulin regimen groups were not statistically different in terms of the number of days with episodes of hyper-or hypoglycemia (p > 0.05). However, a significantly bigger change from baseline (improvement) in random blood glucose (RBG) levels was observed in BBI and SSI plus glargine patients compared to SSI (p = 0.014). Conclusion: Our study showed no significant difference in the number of days with episodes of hyper-or hypoglycemia for SSI vs. other insulin regimens. However, SSI patients had less improvement in their RBG levels compared to other insulin regimen groups. Further studies with a larger sample size are needed to confirm these findings.

Background: Apixaban is a direct and competitive inhibitor of factor Xa. It has been shown to be effective and safe to Prevent Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation Patients. This study is a case report of warfarin-induced cholestasis that occurred one week after starting warfarin for deep venous thrombosis, in which the cholestasis improved after the offending drug was stopped but worsened after beginning apixaban.