Background: Misuse of topical corticosteroids (TCS) is common and constitutes a serious problem in many parts of the world where they can be obtained without prescription. Limited studies have been performed in Saudi Arabia to address this issue. Purpose: We aim to study the prevalence, predisposing factors, and adverse consequences of TCS use without prescription in Saudi Arabia. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed using an Arabic questionnaire distributed through social media applications in May 2020 in Saudi Arabia. Individuals aged 18 years and above who used TCS within the last 2 years were included. The questionnaire consisted of detailed questions about TCS use and demographic information. Results: A total of 720 participants completed the questionnaire. TCS were used without prescription by 43.1% of respondents. Being female was the only identified risk factor for the use of TCS without prescription. The main reason for purchasing TCS without prescription was that the problem seemed too trivial to consult a physician (36.6%). The most common conditions for which TCS were used were treatment of pruritus without skin disease (23.7%) and cosmetic reasons (19.9%). Side effects were reported in 25.6% of participants. The most common side effects were hypopigmentation, itching, redness, and skin sensitivity. Conclusion: The use of TCS without prescription is prevalent in Saudi Arabia. We recommend that local health authorities regulate the use of TCS.

Objectives: Length disparities of children’s limbs might make it difficult for them to engage in social, recreational, and leisure activities. The main goals of surgical treatment of limb length discrepancy (LLD) are to restore limb function and prevent adverse social effects. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of life (QoL) of children who received therapy for limb length discrepancies. Methods: Twenty participants fit the inclusion criteria and completed the validated and translated version of the electronic questionnaire of the brief version of the world health organization questionnaire for QoL assessment the brief version (WHO-QoL-BREF). Answering the questionnaire was administered by an interviewer over the phone. The questionnaire comprised basic patient information and questions regarding the QoL. Results: There were 12 male participants and eight females. The total WHO-QoL BREF score of the participants is 94.15 ± 10.01 (out of 125). The differences between the mean scores of all domains according to participants’ demographic, distortion, and surgical variables were insignificant. Conclusion: Ensuring the QoL and function improvement after treatment of LLD is crucial. More attention must be paid to selecting the appropriate procedure for the suitable patient when treating LLD.

Objectives: To explore the cancer prevention-related nutrition knowledge of primary health care physicians towards nutrition and its relation to the development of cancer. Materials and methods: a cross-sectional study was conducted among family physicians in Riyadh, between November 2019 and April 2020. The participants in the current study were surveyed using a self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire included socio-economic data and data related to the association between nutrition and cancer. Results: The mean correct knowledge score for physicians is good but less than expected (26.5+5.8) 73.6%. Multiple regression revealed that age, position, and nationality to be significantly associated with knowledge of cancer prevention (P<0.05) among physicians. Conclusions: Primary care physicians have good knowledge about the relation between nutrition and cancer but not sufficient, they should have continuous nutrition educational training programs to ensure safe and sound nutritional advice to patients and for the public about the relation of nutrition and cancer.