BackgroundThe number of joint replacements in India is set to grow at the highest rate in the world from 2020 to 2026. It is high time for India to have an efficient and credible registry to help curtail the clinical impact of implant failure at a very early stage by prompt reporting. Methods Indian Joint Registry has been established by ISHKS with new data forms for reporting. These new detailed forms record, in addition to previous form, component-wise details of implants. Additional useful features include Linking with unique ID like PAN or Aadhaar, thromboprophylaxis, untoward intra-operative event, IJR consent and type of anaesthesia. Results There were 712 registered surgeons in IJR database till June 2020. Total TKRs being reported to registry increased from 1019 in 2006 to 27,000 in 2019. Majority of the patients (98.5%) were diagnosed with osteoarthritis knee. Companywise distribution unveils that Johnson & Johnson DePuy represents the highest implant usage at over 37%. There has been increased utilisation of uncemented THR over cemented THR from 2006 to 2019. Dual-mobility THRs have gained ground as surgeon preference for the choice of implant. Conclusion Effective use of quality registries can lead to better health outcomes at a lower cost for the society. An effective, responsive and sustainable registry in India offers many benefits and should be considered as a key objective. Making the registry function in India successfully will undoubtedly require multi-pronged efforts, but can deliver many benefits both to the patient and to the nation as a whole.

Background Lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET) has an array of modalities described for its management. The present study analyzed two modalities used for managing the condition. Methods The present study included 64 non-athletes with LET who failed conservative treatment that included avoiding strenuous activities, ice-fomentation, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, bracing, and physiotherapy for 6 months. A random allocation of the participants was done, with one group injected with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and the other group with corticosteroids. The procedure was performed by the same blinded orthopedic surgeon after localizing the pathology using ultrasound. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores, disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) scores, Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) scores, and handgrip strengths were recorded by blinded observers other than the surgeon administering the injection. Results The average age of the patients was 40 years. The mean VAS score at the latest follow-up of 2 years in the PRP group was 1.25 and it was significantly better than the score of 3.68 in the steroid group ( p < 0.001). The mean DASH score at the latest follow-up of 2 years in the PRP group was 4.00 and it was significantly better than the score of 7.43 in the steroid group ( p < 0.001). The mean PRTEE score at the latest follow-up of 2 years in the PRP group was 3.96 and it was significantly better than the score of 7.53 in the steroid group ( p < 0.001). The scores were better in the steroid group at a short-term follow-up of 3 months ( p < 0.05), while they were better in the PRP group at a long-term follow-up of 2 years ( p < 0.05). Hand-grip strength was comparable in the PRP group (84.43 kg force) and steroid group (76.71 kg force) at the end of the 2-year follow-up with no statistically significant difference ( p = 0.149). Conclusions Corticosteroid injections alleviated symptoms of LET over short-term follow-up providing quicker symptomatic relief; however, the effect faded off over the long term. PRP injections provided a more gradual but sustained improvement over the long-term follow-up, indicating the biological healing potential of PRP.

Background: Trigger finger or stenosing tenosynovitis is a disproportion between the volume of the tendon sheath and its contents. This disproportion prevents gliding of the tendon as it moves freely through the annular pulley. The technique of percutaneous release of the annular pulley for trigger finger has been described well in the literature, which has undergone several modifications, like use of hypodermic needle, tenotome or specially designed knives. Method: We performed percutaneous trigger finger release using a 20-gauge hypodermic needle to know the outcome and efficacy of the technique post release. A Prospective cohort study was conducted in 80 consecutive trigger fingers of 67 patients who were treated by percutaneous release using 20-gauge hypodermic needle. Quinell's grading system was used to quantify severity of triggering and pain was assessed using visual analogue scale (VAS) before and after the procedure. Patients were evaluated based on these two parameters at timely interval and final outcome was assessed at the end of one year. Results: Out of 80 digits treated, most of the subjects were in the age group 40e50 years (39.07%). Most common grade of trigger finger observed was Grade 3 (60%) followed by Grade 4 (30%) with VAS score of 8 (46%) followed by VAS score of 7 (24%) before release. At a year follow-up 95% of patients improved to grade 0 and mean VAS score was 0.44. Three patients developed scar tenderness, which gradually subsided by analgesics and physiotherapy with no other major complications. Conclusion: Our technique of percutaneous release of trigger digit with 20 G needle is effective and can be performed safely with ease. It is cost efficient and has a short learning curve with great acceptance being an outpatient procedure.

Objective: Vertebral artery injury (VAI) after cervical spine trauma often remains undiagnosed. Despite various clinical studies suggesting simultaneous occurrence of VAI with cervical spine trauma, guidelines regarding screening and management of posttraumatic VAI are yet to be formulated. The primary objective of the current study was to formulate a low-cost screening protocol for posttraumatic VAI, thereby reducing the incidence of missed VAI in developing countries. Materials and Methods: This was a single-center prospective study performed on 61 patients using plain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a screening tool to assess the frequency of VAI and routine X-ray to detect morphological fracture patterns associated with the VAI in posttraumatic cervical spine cases. If the MRI study showed any evidence of vascular disruption, then further investigation in the form of computed tomography angiography was done to confirm the diagnosis. Results: This study showed the incidence of VAI was 14.75% (9/61). Of 61 patients, 16 had supraaxial, and 45 patients sustained subaxial cervical spine fractures. In the cohort of nine cases of VAI, eight patients had subaxial cervical spine injuries, of which seven were due to flexion-distraction injury. C5–C6 flexion-distraction injury was most commonly associated with VAI (4 cases). Of the nine cases, five succumbed to injury (mortality 55.55%), and 19 patients from the non-VAI group succumbed to injury (mortality 36.53%). From surviving four cases with VAI, two had improvement in the American Spinal Injury Association scale by Grade 1. Conclusion: VAI in cervical spine trauma is an underrecognized phenomenon. Plain MRI axial imaging sequence can be an instrumental low-cost screening tool in resource-deficient parts of the world. VAI has tendency to occur with high-velocity trauma like bi-facetal dislocation, which has a high mortality and poor neurological recovery.

Masquelet technique has been well described in upper limb but it can be used judiciously in lower limb, especially foot to reconstruct the defect, restore the length, minimize implant left in situ, and achieve complete functional recovery for the patient.