There is no accepted gold standard for management of rhinophyma, and each modality succeeds in maintaining hemostasis, reducing scarring and achieving satisfactory cosmesis to different degrees. There is a conflicting data on the theoretical risk of recurrence with partial excision due to incomplete removal of tissue. Further studies evaluating this risk and alternate methods of prevention are required.
The nasolabial turnover flap was first described by Spear et al in 1987 for the coverage of full thickness defects of the lateral ala. It offered a single-stage repair that recreated the internal nasal lining, the external nasal valve, and the rounded contour of the ala without requiring a cartilage graft. A frequently encountered problem with the execution of Spear's original design is elevation of the ipsilateral commissure of the adjacent lip due to its broad proximal pedicle. Here, the authors describe a fusiform-type design with a proximal, superiorly tapered apex that relies on anteriorly coursing perforators from the underlying angular artery. The authors also review the inherent advantages and disadvantages of the flap itself and the unique situation where there is a skin cancer adjacent to the donor site.
BACKGROUND The mixing of hyaluronic acid or calcium hydroxylapatite fillers with normal saline, plain lidocaine, or lidocaine with epinephrine before injection is a familiar practice among dermatologists. However, the frequency of this practice and rationale behind it has not been well studied. OBJECTIVE To better elucidate the clinical practice of mixing fillers with other solutions before injecting among dermatologists. METHODS A survey was electronically distributed to members of the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery. RESULTS Four hundred seventy-five dermatologists responded to the survey. Thirty-five percent of respondents mix fillers before injection. Solutions used were as follows: plain lidocaine (44%), lidocaine with epinephrine (36%), normal saline (30%), and sterile water (7%). Respondents mix filler for the following reasons: to decrease viscosity (40%), increase anesthesia (30%), decrease swelling (17%), and increase volume (13%). CONCLUSION Despite the lack of evidence, more than one-third of dermatologists surveyed mix fillers with other solutions before injection. Plain lidocaine is most commonly used. The top reason for mixing fillers is to decrease viscosity and facilitate ease of injection. More scientific data are needed to support this practice and better understand the biophysical changes that occur when mixing fillers with other solutions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.