Background and objectives: Smile is one of the most effective means by which people convey their emotions. The objective of this study was to capture, analyse and measure the parameters through videos clips for studying the dynamics of posed and unposed smile and to measure the parameters through video clips for studying the dynamics of speech. Methodology: A total of 100 subjects seeking orthodontic treatment with Angle's Class I malocclusion were included in the study. The principal investigator selected the frames for speech and a panel of five members selected the appropriate frames for posed smile and unposed smiles. Frames after videography were used for measurements. Parameters like Maximum incisor exposure, Lower lip to upper incisor, Gingival exposure, Interlabial gap etc were measured in "mm" for posed and unposed smile frames. Categorical data was compared using McNemar's test. p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: The median of maximum upper incisal exposure (p ¼ 2.2e-16), lower lip to upper incisor (p ¼ 2.422e-13 A ), inter-labial gap (p ¼ 2.2e-16 A ), smile width (p ¼ 5.212e-16 A ) and smile index were significant (p ¼ 0.0001 A ). There was a significant change from not exposed to exposed gingival exposure over posed smile to unposed smile (p ¼ 0.0008). The most posterior maxillary tooth visible in the posed and unposed groups were the second premolars in 57% and 74% patients, respectively. In both the smile groups, 55% of subjects exhibited a consonant smile. Conclusion: It can be concluded that the information obtained from the current video graphic study can be used as a guideline for the diagnosis and as a part of comprehensive treatment planning.
Dental implants have become the most promising and accepted prosthetic alternative to missing teeth. Innovative and technological advances in implant dentistry have improved the performance and long term prognosis of dental implants. The growing demand for dental implants has led many manufacturers to enter the industry. With this growth in implant dentistry various implant brands and their components are made available in the markets that vary in terms of design and other features. Success of implant restorations is related to various components involved with the prosthesis. Implant abutment is the link between implant and restoration; right selection of this abutment is vital for the success of implant prosthesis. There are varieties of implant abutments available in the market. Clinician should have adequate knowledge about these abutments and various factors that affect abutment selection, to choose the right one. Each implant case is different and clinician should be able to identify requirements of every individual case and choose the best suitable abutment available in the market. These abutments vary in implant abutment connection, material, type of retention, and fabrication methods. Though the ideal concept is prosthetically driven implant placement, many times anatomical features, esthetic requirements, soft tissue profile, axial load distribution, malpositioned implants, and many other patient factors do not allow ideal implant placement. Such cases can be managed by careful selection of abutments by assessing the clinical requirements, thus offering better treatment outcome. This paper is an attempt to contemplate various factors affecting abutment selection, and throw light on various implant abutments available in the market, thus guiding the clinician in abutment selection. Hence this article summarizes complete information about the implant abutments, including introduction, types, selection, and different abutments available in market. KEY WORDS Abutment Material, Implant Abutments, Implant Abutment Connection, Prosthesis Retention
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.