The goal of undergraduate chemistry laboratories is to allow students to learn about chemical systems and key laboratory skills. They should then apply this knowledge to solve problems and connect macroscopic observations in the laboratory with those occurring at the submicroscopic level. Unfortunately, these needs are not met through traditional confirmation laboratories. Therefore, many chemistry instructors are turning toward research-based laboratories and course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs). There are also many cases where summer workshops, often with nontraditional pedagogy, are used for students. This article describes the STEM CoLab Program, a novel type of summer workshop that seeks to build student chemistry knowledge and skills in research and presentation at the beginning of their college work. This program uses the principles of CUREs for students who are just entering the university, mostly as freshmen. Several different phenomena have been investigated during the program. In this paper, we report the overall work of the program from 2016 through 2021 and provide additional details on the program's implementation in 2020 and 2021 when students conducted their work from home, using a combination of a take home research kit for studying salivary amylase "in vitro" and computer-based visualizations of amylaseinhibitor interactions "in silico" using PyMOL and online docking tools.

This paper examines student experiences in a workshop-based undergraduate research experience studying the activity and inhibition of salivary amylase that provides students with the chance to participate in authentic scientific research prior to the start of their undergraduate studies, following the structure of a course-based undergraduate research experience (CURE).Understanding student experiences at this point in their studies is important because research experiences at the beginning of university studies have been shown to increase retention in STEM. This study utilizes meaningful learning and situated cognition as theoretical frameworks and phenomenography as a methodological framework, applied to data from semistructured interviews with six students. The student experiences were characterized as an outcome space detailing the degree of their meaningful learning with respect to their understanding of the research process, nature of science, and the poster creation and presentation process. The findings highlight that meaningful learning is achieved when research is connected to students' personal lives or future job interests. The research process and nature of science must also be made explicit to students by emphasizing the iterative nature of research and highlighting distinctions between science and nonscience fields. All participating students displayed an understanding that anyone can partake in science anywhere. Implications for building on this work to develop an understanding of students' senses of belonging and self-identity are also discussed.