Background: Streptococcus mutans is a bacteria which has glucosyltransferase (GTF) enzyme and acts as the main agent that causes dental caries. GTF enzyme will convert sucrose into fructose and glucan. Temulawak (Curcuma xanthorrhiza Roxb.) is one of the traditional herbs which has xanthorrhizol, curcumin, flavonoid, tanin, and saponin as an antibacterial agent. Purpose: The purpose of this research is to investigate the effect of temulawak extract (Curcuma xanthorrhiza Roxb.) to the activity of GTF enzyme Streptococcus mutans. Method: This research used 25%, 37,5%, and 50% concentration of  temulawak extract as the treatment, and 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate as a control. The method of this research consists of three steps; preparing the temulawak extract concentration of 25%, 37,5%, and 50%, preparing the GTF enzyme from the supernatant of Streptococcus mutans, and testing GTF enzyme activity by analyzing the fructose concentration using High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC). Perusal of the fructose area was based on the retention time of fructose. One unit of GTF enzyme activity is defined as the 1 μmol fructose / ml of enzyme / hour. Result: The obtained data then were analyzed by Post-Hoc Tukey (HSD). The result showed a significant difference between each treatment group with the control group (p<0.05). Conclussion: This research concludes that temulawak extract with 25%, 37,5%, and 50% concentrationcan’t inhibit the GTF enzyme activity of Streptococcus mutans.

Background: Before restoration, it is necessary to clean the cavity from the smear layer and residual bacteria such as Sreptococcus mutans using a 'gold standard' cavity cleanser, namely 2% Chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX), however CHX 2% has a disadvantage of having a toxic effect on fibroblasts, osteoblasts, myoblasts, odontoblast-like cells, Chinese hamster ovary cells, and buccal epithelial cells. The shortcomings of the 2% CHX triggered researchers to look for alternative cavity cleansers that are more biocompatible, namely cocoa peel extract because it contains of antibacterial compounds including alkaloids, flavonoids, tannins, saponins, and terponoids with a non-toxic 6% concentration. Purpose: To analyze the difference of antibacterial activity between cocoa peel extract with a concentration of 6% compared to chlorhexidine digluconate 2% against Streptococcus mutans. Methods: This research was an in vitro laboratory experimental study with the posttest only control group design which included two treatment groups, namely 6% cocoa peel extract and 2% CHX. This research was conducted using the inhibition zone diffusion method against S. mutans to see the antibacterial power of each sample. Results: There was a significant difference (p <0.05) in the mean diameter of the inhibition zone between 6% cacao peel extract, namely 11.5406 mm and CHX 2%, namely 13.2156 mm.  Conclusion: Chlorhexidine digluconate 2% has a greater antibacterial power than 6% cocoa peel extract (Theobroma cacao L.) against Streptococcus mutans.