Objective: To assess the degree of psychological impact among surgical providers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Summary of Background Data: The COVID-19 pandemic has extensively impacted global healthcare systems. We hypothesized that the degree of psychological impact would be higher for surgical providers deployed for COVID-19 work, certain surgical specialties, and for those who knew of someone diagnosed with, or who died, of COVID-19. Methods: We conducted a global web-based survey to investigate the psychological impact of COVID-19. The primary outcomes were the depression anxiety stress scale-21 and Impact of Event Scale-Revised scores. Results: A total of 4283 participants from 101 countries responded. 32.8%, 30.8%, 25.9%, and 24.0% screened positive for depression, anxiety, stress, and PTSD respectively. Respondents who knew someone who died of COVID-19 were more likely to screen positive for depression, anxiety, stress, and PTSD (OR 1.3, 1.6, 1.4, 1.7 respectively, all P < 0.05). Respondents who knew of someone diagnosed with COVID-19 were more likely to screen positive for depression, stress, and PTSD (OR 1.2, 1.2, and 1.3 respectively, all P < 0.05). Surgical specialties that operated in the head and neck region had higher psychological distress among its surgeons. Deployment for COVID- 19-related work was not associated with increased psychological distress. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic may have a mental health legacy outlasting its course. The long-term impact of this ongoing traumatic event underscores the importance of longitudinal mental health care for healthcare personnel, with particular attention to those who know of someone diagnosed with, or who died of COVID-19.

[No abstract available]

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy has become the standard procedure to procure kidney graft. Transplantation using multiple arteries allograft is technically more challenging and still controversial with respect to renal transplantation outcomes. The objective of this study was to examine the transplantation outcome in both donor and recipient outcome of multiple arteries allograft kidney compared with single renal artery kidney. Eligible studies were identified from electronic databases: PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Science Direct, and CINAHL as of October 2016. Relevant parameters explored using Review Manager V5.2 included donor and recipient outcomes. Twenty-four studies were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with SA, MA kidneys were associated with a longer donor operative time. There was no difference between donor length of stay, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, first warm ischemic time (WIT-I), and donor surgical complications in donors with multiple arteries compared with single. There was an increased risk of one-year graft loss (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.26, p = 0.016), recipient vascular complications and recipient ureteral complications in multiple arteries compared with single artery allografts. Kidney transplantation with multiple arteries is relatively as safe as single artery in terms of donor outcomes. However, transplantation with multiple arteries allograft had several potential negative impacts on the recipient outcomes.

No abstract