This study aims to determine the effect of Cake application on English learning outcomes of class X SMKS Muhammadiyah Sidrap. This research was conducted at SMKS Muhammadiyah Sidrap in July 2021. This research is a quantitative study using the True Experimental Design method. The population in this study were students of class X SMKS Muhammadiyah Sidrap. The class was divided into 2 groups, namely the control group with 14 students and the experimental group with 15 students. Each research group uses a different learning method. The control group learns using the lecture method, while the experimental group learns using the Cake application. Data collection techniques in this study were in the form of multiple choice tests. The data analysis technique is in the form of t-test. The result of this study is that the experimental group is larger than the control group, so it can be concluded that H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted.

This study aims to describe the form of ethical speaking of the elemntary school age children in grade V  and found the factors cause the less ethical language at primary school age children in grade 5  SD Watang Sidenreng. This study used qualitative descriptive approach. The sources of data obtained from the fifth grade students SD Negeri 5 Watang Sidenreng totaling 28 students. Data obtained by participant observation, in-depth interviews, the study documents, then treated with qualitative descriptive analysis. The results of this study indicate that a form of ethical language in class V can be analyzed in terms of words, sentences, phrases, intonation elements (suprasegmental), and kinesic elements. The factors determining the level of ethical or less ethical levels depend on several factors, namely (1) smooth rough words. (2) a short length utterance. (3) the order of the utterance. (4) intonation (suprasegmentl), and kinesic cues. (5) the use of the pharase marker. While the factors that lead to unethical language in class V, namely (1) friends direct criticize the harsh words, (2) being the most correct opinion, (3) intentionaly accuse opponents utterance, (4) intentionally criticize the opponent utterance, (5) intentionaly embarrass oppenents utterance, (6) giving bad names, (7) brag or boast, (8) being happy if friends misfortune, (9) using derect speech, and (10) has become a bad habit.