PURPOSE The overall survival (OS) results in patients with ALK-positive metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have rarely been reported. The aim of this prospective-retrospective cohort study was to obtain real-world data on the use of crizotinib or chemotherapy in patients with ALK-positive metastatic NSCLC in Russia. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with epidermal growth factor receptor–negative metastatic NSCLC were screened in 23 cancer centers. To be eligible, patients were required to have confirmation of ALK rearrangement. Patients were treated with crizotinib (250 mg twice daily; n = 96) or the investigator’s choice of platinum-based chemotherapy (n = 53). The primary end point was OS. RESULTS A total of 149 ALK-positive patients were included. Mean age was 53 years in both groups. Patients were predominately women (59%) and never-smokers (74%), and most patients had adenocarcinoma histology (95%). At a median follow-up time of 15 months, 79 of the 149 patients included in the analysis had died. Median OS from the start of treatment was 31 months (95% CI, 28.5 to 33.5 months) in the crizotinib group and 15.0 months (95% CI, 9.0 to 21.0 months) in the chemotherapy group ( P < .001). The objective response rate was 34% in the crizotinib group. Among patients with brain metastasis, one complete response (6%) and five partial responses (31%) were achieved. Grade 3 adverse events were observed in three patients (3%) in the crizotinib group. CONCLUSION The improved OS observed in crizotinib clinical trials in ALK-positive NSCLC was also observed in the less selective patient populations treated in daily practice in Russia. The use of standard chemotherapy in these patients remains common but seems inappropriate as a result of the effectiveness of newer treatments, such as crizotinib.

No abstract

644 Background: an assessment of efficacy and safety of lenvatinib in combination with everolimus in unselected patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) progressed during or following ≥1 line of antiangiogenic targeted therapy. Methods: Russian multicenter observational study included 73 consecutive patients with morphologically verified mRCC progressed during or following ≥1 line of antiangiogenic targeted therapy, treated with lenvatinib (18 mg/d) and everolimus (5 mg/d) in 20 Russian centers. Median age of the patients was 59 (23-73) years, a male-to-female ratio - 3:1. Most common histological type of kidney cancer was clear-cell RCC (71 (95.8%)). More than 2 lines of previous treatment were administered in 45 (61.6%) cases. Most patients were diagnosed with multiple metastases (71 (97.3%)) in >1 site (61 (83.6%)). Nephrectomy was performed in 87.7% (64/73) of cases. At the combined therapy start ECOG PS 2-4 was registered in 16 (20.5%), poor prognosis according to IMDC score – in 33 (45.2%) patients. Median follow-up was 9.7 (1-26) months. Results: objective response rate was 11% (8/73); tumor control was reached in 93.2% (68/73) of cases. Median objective response duration was 10.5 (4.3-16.8) months, tumor control duration – 10.0 (2.5-17.5) months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) achieved 16.9 (95% confidence intervals (CI): 12.1-20.6), overall survival (OS) – 20.8 (95% CI: 15.7-25.9) months. Any adverse events (AE) developed in 83.6% (61/73), AE grade 3-5 - in 23.3% (17/73) of cases. Most frequent AE grade 3-4 were diarrhea (10 (13.6%)) and arterial hypertension (6 (8.2%)). Unacceptable toxicity demanded treatment cancellation in 4.2% (3/73), therapy interruption – in 30.1% (22/73) and dose reduction – in 32.9% (24/73) of patients. Conclusions: unselected mRCC patients administered with combined targeted therapy in the real world practice were registered with lower objective response rate, similar survival and better tolerability comparing with population assigned for lenvatinib plus everolimus in the randomized phase II trial.

666 Background: Targeted therapy with axitinib resulted in a greater objective response rate and prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) compared to sorafenib in patients with previously treated metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in AXIS study. 75% of patients had intermediate and poor IMDC prognosis. In this phase 2 study, we assessed the activity of axitinib in mRCC patients with favourable risk and a history of prior VEGFR-directed therapy. Methods: Patients were required to have clear cell mRCC, favourable risk according to IMDC criteria, and to have received first-line treatment with sunitinib or pazopanib. Prior treatment with other agents was not permitted. The primary endpoint of the study was PFS. Additional endpoints included response rate, safety, and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 21 patients were enrolled, 62% of whom were male. Median age was 59 years. 11 (52%) patients had 2 and more metastatic sites. 67% and 33% of patients received first-line sunitinib or pazopanib with a median PFS of 17 months (95% CI 14-20). After a median follow-up of 16 months, the median PFS and OS was not yet reached. The current study did achieve its primary endpoint based on the 10-month PFS of 71.4%. 3 (14.3%) patients had confirmed partial responses and 14 (66.7%) had stable disease. No grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were observed; the most frequent grade 1/2 treatment-related adverse events were hypertension (57.1%), fatigue (57.1%), GI (33%) and skin (19%) toxicity. 7 patients had dose-escalation of axitinib and 1 patient had dose reduction. Conclusions: The encouraging PFS and favorable safety profile observed in FavorAx study support the administration of axitinib in mRCC patients with favourable IMDC risk and a history of prior sunitinib or pazopanib. Clinical trial information: NCT02700568.

Objective. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival; secondary endpoints included overall survival, objective response rate and duration, tumor control rate and duration, as well as safety profile of lenvatinib with everolimus in consecutive patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who had disease progression after targeted antiangiogenic therapy.Materials and methods. This observational study included 129 consecutive patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma resistant to targeted antiangiogenic therapy. The median age was 60 years; a male to female ratio was 3.1:1. Twenty-seven patients (20.9 %) had ECOG performance status of 2—4. The majority of study participants (n = 127; 98.4 %) had multiple metastases. Tumor lesions were located in >1 organ in 104 cases (80.6 %). The primary tumor was removed in 110 (85.3 %), including 39 (30.2 %) patients undergone cytoreductive surgery. Seventy patients (54.2 %) had earlier received more than one line of therapy. Upon enrollment, there were 13 IMDC favourable-risk patients (10.1 %), 86 IMDC intermediate-risk patients (66.6 %), and 29 IMDC poor-risk patients (22.5 %). In one patient (0.8 %), the IMDC risk was not estimated. All patients received lenvatinib at a dose of 18 mg/day and everolimus at a dose of 5 mg/day. The median follow-up was 10.5 (1—30) months.Results. Median progression-free survival was 14.9 (11.9—17.9) months; overall survival was 19.9 (15.2—24.6) months. The objective response rate was 17.0 % (median duration 9.7 (2.8—16.5) months); tumor control rate was 72.9 % (median duration 10.0 (2.5—17.5) months). Adverse events were observed in 112patients (86.8 %) with grade III—IVadverse events registered in 27participants (20.9 %). Five participants (3.9 %) needed inpatient treatment of adverse events; one patient (0.8 %) died due to adverse events. Adverse events required treatment discontinuation in 4 patients (3.1 %), treatment interruption in 35 patients (27.1 %), and dose reduction in 33 patients (25.6 %).Conclusion. The results of the secondary analysis in the ROSLERCM observational study confirmed the results obtained earlier on the efficacy and safety of the lenvatinib plus everolimus combination in the second- and subsequent-line therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma resistant to targeted antiangiogenic therapy in consecutive Russian patients.